Pentecost Sunday
Descent of God the Holy Ghost
Birthday of the Catholic Church

Pentecost Sunday
May 23, 2010

Dear Readers,

“WHY Do You Do WHAT You do?” has been a frequently asked question ever since my own Ordination to the Holy Priesthood many, many years ago.  During that long time period, other Priests and Prelates have told me they have also been asked this same question many times.

The basic answer to “why” relates to motivation which is primarily for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls.  But the cause and effect relationships involved concerning the “why”, the “what” and other factors such as “how”, “where”, etc. are synergistically linked together like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.  Each of these things, by themselves, are inadequate explanations which can not be correctly understood without knowing and understanding each of them, just as in the same way all of the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle must be in place to see the complete picture, or in the same way that all of the pieces of a computer must be in place before the computer will work or everyone on a sports team functions as a team player.

But, rather than “re-invent the wheel”, as the expression goes, I am sharing with you the answers to not only the “why”, but also the “what” and the other factors involved such as “how”, “where”, etc. which were explained by a Catholic Prelate who is deep within what future historians will call “Catacombs III”, and thereby also make his answers, found in his Pastoral Letter, my answers to  the “why”, the “what”, the “who”, the “how”, the “where”, etc.

Various pictures and photos have been interspersed, with permission, in order to make the text even more relevant and to more easily raise the mind and heart to God and to Holy thoughts.

Thank you in advance for taking time from your busy schedule to prayerfully and objectively read  the following answer from the following Pastoral Letter.

God Bless You!

Father Michael

 

---

---

Graphic of the First Page of the Pastoral Letter
The Rest of the Pages of this Pastoral Letter
Are All Below in HTML Format to Make it Easier for You to Read

Proper Preparation - Part 1 of 2

“Because your adversary the Devil, as a roaring lion, goeth about seeking whom he may devour” (1 Peter 5:8) with his false accusations, lies, half-truths, subtle errors, confusion, equivocation, ambiguity, and emotionalism, all of us must get into the habit or reciting the Exorcism every day.

O Glorious Prince of the Celestial Hosts, Saint Michael the Archangel, protect me and defend me in the conflict which I have to sustain against Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places (Ephesians 6:12). Come to my rescue, for God has created me to His image and likeness, and He has redeemed me at a great price from the tyranny of the Devil. It is thou, O Holy Saint Michael the Archangel, whom Holy Church venerates as her guardian and her protector, thou whom the Lord has charged to conduct redeemed souls into Heaven. Pray, therefore, the God of Peace to subdue Satan beneath my feet, that he may no longer retain me captive nor do injury to the Church. Present my prayers to the Most High God, that without delay He may draw His Mercy down upon me. Seize the Dragon, the Old Serpent, which is the Devil and Satan ; bind him and cast him into the bottomless pit ...that he (may) no more seduce the nations (Apocalypse 20:2-3).

---

EXORCISM

---

I humbly and confidently invoke the power of the Holy Name of Jesus and the power of the intercession of the Immaculate Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, of St. Michael the Archangel, of Saints Peter and Paul, of the rest of the Holy Apostles and all of the Holy Angels and Saints of Heaven to repulse the attacks and deceits of the Devil.

Let God arise, and let His enemies be scattered; and let them that hate Him flee from before His Face.

As smoke vanishes, so let them vanish away; as wax melts before the fire, so let the wicked perish at the Presence of God (Psalm 67:2-3).

V. Behold the Cross of the Lord. (Hold up a Crucifix or a Cross.) Flee, bands of enemies.
R. The Lion of the Tribe of Juda, the Offspring of David, hath conquered.

V. May Thy mercy descend upon me.
R. As great as my hope in Thee.

By the Holy Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, of the Immaculate Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, of St. Michael the Archangel, of Saints Peter and Paul and all of the Holy Apostles and all of the Holy Angels and Saints of Heaven, you are all driven from me, whoever you may be, including all unclean spirits, Satanic powers, infernal invaders, wicked legions, assemblies and sects. In the Name and by the Virtue of Our Lord Jesus Christ, may you be snatched away and driven from the True Church of God and from me whose soul was redeemed by the Most Precious Blood of the Divine Lamb.

They command you, cunning serpents and all of the human agents of Satan, to stop confusing me and to stop deluding the human race; to stop persecuting the Church, to stop tormenting God's elect and sifting them as wheat. This is the command made to you by the Most High God, with Whom in your haughty insolence you still pretend to be equal; the God Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the Truth (1 Timothy 2:4).

God the Father commands you. God the Son commands you. God the Holy Ghost commands you.

Jesus Christ, the Eternal Word of God made Flesh, commands you; He Who, to save our race lost through your malice, humbled Himself, becoming obedient unto death (Philippians 2:8), commands you; He Who has built His One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church on the firm Rock of Himself (1 Corinthians 10:4) and declared that the Gates of Hell shall never prevail against her, because He dwells with her all days, even to the consummation of the world (Matthew 28:20), commands you. The hidden power of the Holy Cross overcomes you as does also the power of the mysteries of the Holy Catholic Faith.

The glorious Wife of the Holy Ghost commands you; the Holy Theotokos, Mother of God, commands you; the Immaculate Conception, who, by her profound humility, crushed your proud head, commands you.

Each of the Holy Apostles, as ordained Exorcists, command you. The blood of the Holy Martyrs and the pious intercession of all of the Holy Angels and Saints command you.

Thus, cursed Dragon, and you, wicked Legions, your are adjured by the Living God, by the True God, by the Holy God, by the God Who so loved the world, as to give His only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him may not perish but may have life everlasting (John 3:16) to cease deceiving me and all other human creatures and to stop pouring out upon us the toxic fumes of lies and confusion and the poison of eternal perdition; to stop harming the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church and hindering her liberty; to retreat, Satan, the Father of Lies, the Inventor and Master of all error, confusion, half-truths and deceit, the Enemy of our salvation; to give place to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, in Whom you have found none of your works; to give place to the only one True Church, the Mystical Body of Christ which is the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church founded by Jesus Christ at the price of His Most Precious Blood; to stoop beneath the All-Powerful Hand of God; to tremble and flee at the evocation of the Holy and terrible Name of Jesus: this Name which causes Hell to tremble, this Name to which the Nine Choirs of Angels in Heaven are humbly submissive, this Name which the Holy Cherubim and Seraphim praise unceasingly, repeating: Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord, the God of hosts .

V. O Lord, hear my prayer.
R. And let my cry come unto Thee.

V. May the Lord be with thee.
R. And with thy spirit.

LET US PRAY

God of Heaven, God of earth, God of Archangels and Angels, God of Patriarchs, God of Prophets, God of Apostles, God of Martyrs, God of Confessors, God of Virgins, God of the Married, God Who hast power to give life after death and rest after work, because there is no other God than Thee and there can be no other, for Thou art the Creator of all things, visible and invisible, of Whose Reign there shall be no end, I humbly prostrate myself before Thy Glorious Majesty and I supplicate Thee to deliver us from all of the tyranny of the infernal spirits, from their snares and their furious wickedness. Deign, O Lord, to protect me and my family and friends by Thy Omnipotent Power and to preserve us safe and sound, I beseech Thee, through Jesus Christ, Thy Son, Our Lord. Amen.

From the snares of the Devil, deliver us, O Lord. That Thy Church may serve Thee in peace and liberty, I beseech Thee to hear me. That Thou wouldst crush down all enemies of Thy Church, I beseech Thee to hear me.

THEREFORE, IN THE NAME AND BY THE POWER OF ALMIGHTY GOD,
THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY GHOST:
BEGONE SATAN!
BEGONE ALL EVIL SPIRITS!
 

(Holy Water is now sprinkled while saying:)

---

THE CONCLUDING PRAYER TO
SAINT MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL 

---

Come, O Holy Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the Devil. Rebuke him, O God, we humbly beseech Thee; and do thou, O Prince of the Heavenly Hosts, by the Power of God, thrust into Hell Satan and all of the evil spirits who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Amen.

Proper Preparation - Part 2 of 2

Proper preparation is also necessary because, as Saint John Chrysostom, a Father of the Catholic Church teaches, unless God the Holy Ghost prepares the minds and hearts of those who write and of those who read, the writer writes in vain and the reader reads in vain.

Therefore, We invite you to join Us:

Come, O Holy Ghost, fill the hearts of Thy Faithful and kindle in them the fire of Thy love.  Send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created.  And thou shalt renew the face of the earth.

O God, Who didst instruct the hearts of Thy faithful by the light of Thy Holy Spirit, grant us in the same Spirit to relish what is right and ever to rejoice in His consolation.  Through Christ Our Lord.  Amen.

Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary; pray for us.
Saint Thomas Aquinas; pray for us.

Beloved Brethren:

Patriarchs
Saint Athanasius the Great and Saint Cyril of Alexandria

“The divine disciple wrote, being ready always to satisfy [i.e. to give an answer to] every one that asketh you a reason of that hope which is in you [1 Peter 3:15].  But he who willeth to do this, innovates in nothing, nor doth he frame any new exposition of Faith, but rather maketh plain to those who ask him, what faith he hath concerning Christ”  (Patriarch Saint Cyril of Alexandria [b. at Alexandria, Egypt in 376 A.D. - d. at Alexandria, Egypt in 444 A.D.], Patriarch of Alexandria [412 A. D. - 444 A.D.], Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, Ancient Epitome of Canon VII of the First Œcumenical Council of Ephesus on Tuesday, July 22, 431 A.D.).

“And Jesus coming, spoke to them, saying:  All power is given to Me in Heaven and in earth. Going therefore, teach ye all nations...   Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:18-20; emphasis added).

“In the last days, shall come dangerous times.  Men shall be lovers of themselves, covetous, haughty, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, wicked, without affection, without peace, slanderers, incontinent, unmerciful, without kindness, traitors, stubborn, puffed up, and lovers of pleasures more than of God.  Having an appearance indeed of godliness, but denying the power thereof. Now these avoid.  For of these sort are they who creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, who are led away with divers desires:  Ever learning, and never attaining to the knowledge of the Truth  (2 Timothy 3:1-7).

Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X

This had already begun more than a Century ago as is testified herewith:

“At this very troublesome and difficult time....  the enemy has, indeed, long been prowling about the  fold and attacking it with such subtle cunning that now, more than ever  before, the prediction of the Apostle to the elders of the Church of  Ephesus seems to be verified: ‘I know that.... fierce wolves will get in among you, and will not spare the flock’ (Acts 20:29).  Those who still are zealous for  the glory of God are seeking the causes and reasons for this decline in  religion. Coming to a different explanation, each points out, according to  his own view, a different plan for the protection and restoration of the kingdom of God on earth. But it seems to Us, Venerable Brethren, that while  we should not overlook other considerations, We are forced to agree with  those who hold that the chief cause of the present indifference and, as it were, infirmity of soul, and the serious evils that result from it, is to  be found above all in ignorance of things Divine. This is fully in accord  with what God Himself declared through the Prophet Osee: ‘And there is no  knowledge of God in the land. Cursing and lying and killing and theft and  adultery have overflowed: and blood hath touched blood. Thereafter shall  the land mourn, and everyone that dwelleth in it shall languish’ (Osee 4:1-3)” (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914],  Encyclical Acerbo Nimis, Saturday, April 15, 1905).

“We were terrified beyond all else by the disastrous state of human society today.  For who can fail to see that society is at the present time, more than in any past age, suffering from a terrible and deep-rooted malady which, developing every day and eating into its inmost being, is dragging it to destruction? You understand, Venerable Brethren, what this disease is -- apostasy from God, than which inTruth nothing is more allied with ruin, according to the word of the Prophet: “For behold they that go far from Thee shall perish” (Psalm 72:17)” (Saint Pius X, Encyclical E Supremi Apostolatus [Tuesday, October 4, 1903], ¶ 2).

Among other things, such anti-God, anti-Religion texts boast how it has never been proven that God even exists!

Such errors try to take advantage of those Catholics who do not know their Catholic Faith very well.  Therefore, We hope that the brief summary which follows, will be helpful for all Catholics to refute such worldly errors as atheism.

Although it has been many years since Our days as a Seminary Professor, it is time to brush off the dust of that hat, for however brief a refutation to such a Satanic lie! Hopefully, this will also refresh the memories of Our Reverend Clergy? Please refer to Appendix 1 below.

The Present Problem

Patriarch Cardinal Slipyj

“Our Catholic Faithful, prohibited from celebrating the Liturgy and receiving the Sacraments, must descend into the Catacombs” (Patriarch Kyr Josyf Cardinal Slipyj, VISTI Y RYMU, Rik 9, nos. 16-17, Rome, December 1971).

It is bad enough to have had to encounter the rotten fruits of those people whose college and/or university years were adulterated by their atheistic pagan secular humanist Professors and textbooks, but since Synod Vatican 2 [Thursday, October 11, 1962 - Wednesday, December 8, 1965], to have to encounter it among the Priests and Prelates of the  Satanic Vatican 2 church  is one reason why many Catholics have sought refuge in Catacombs III where Catholics can remain faithful to the unchangeable, infallible teachings and Divine Liturgies of the Catholic Church which are found in the immutable Divine Revelation (both Sacred Scripture and Divine Tradition), the unchangeable Deposit of the Catholic Faith, and the unalterable ontological essence and the likewise unchangeable metaphysical essence, as they were perfectly instituted by the Eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ, for offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and for administering each of the Seven Sacraments.

Because all of the Prelates and Priests who are in Catacombs III are, by the Grace of God, faithful in preserving and doing these things, in contradistinction to the  Satanic Vatican 2 church  which has changed everything that is “Catholic” into what is NOT Catholic, some people who are aware of these differences, and other people who are simply confused because they are not sure about who is “right” (i.e. whether it be the Prelates and Priests in Catacombs III or whether it be the Prelates and Priests in the   Satanic Vatican 2 church) and who is “wrong” (i.e. whether it be the Prelates and Priests in Catacombs III or whether it be the Prelates and Priests in the   Satanic Vatican 2 church), today politely ask the Prelates and Priests who are in Catacombs III:

Originally, many years ago the question “WHY Do You Do WHAT You do?” was asked as two separate questions, namely:   WHAT Do You Do? and WHY Do You Do It?

The answer to these two questions has always remained the same from the very beginning.  In general, here is the answer to these two questions, as We wrote it many, many years ago in Our booklet entitled: “Welcome to the Catholic Church!”, pages 7 to 8:

WHAT We do is “all of those things which Jesus Christ, through His Holy Apostles, requires Us to do.”

WHY We do it is “because Jesus Christ (“Be not led away with various and strange doctrines.  JESUS CHRIST YESTERDAY, AND TODAY, AND THE SAME FOREVER” - (Hebrews 13:8-9; emphasis added) IS the promised Messias, the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, the Word made Flesh.”  (“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  The Same was in the beginning with God.  All things were made by Him:  and without Him was made nothing that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men.  And the light shineth in darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it....  And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us - and we saw His glory, the glory as it were of the Only Begotten of the Father - full of Grace and Truth” - John 1:1-5; 1:14.)

“All organizations have certain requirements which must be met before becoming a member of it.  This is also the case with the real, i.e., the true, CATHOLIC Church. And, just as any organization imposes certain duties and obligations on its members, so also does the true CATHOLIC Church. For example, some of the duties of Prelates and Priests are found in two Oaths which they take.

“ These Oaths are called THE PROFESSION OF FAITH and THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM.”

“But all members of the true CATHOLIC Church have certain duties and responsibilities, e.g., keeping the Ten Commandments of God and keeping the Commandments of the Church, learning - and then totally and unconditionally accepting and believing - the entire Deposit of Faith, unchanged, making  a PROFESSION OF FAITH  by assisting at the Holy Sacrifice of the real CATHOLIC Mass on all Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation, receiving the Sacraments, etc.”

“ALL real CATHOLICS must do these things in order to remain REAL and TRUE members of the true CATHOLIC Church.  To do otherwise is to automatically separate oneself from the true CATHOLIC Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, because the requirements for continued membership have not been properly met.”

“This is why it is so important for every Catholic to really learn the true CATHOLIC Faith as best as one can do according to one’s abilities and circumstances. The importance of this Religious Education is not, as some may think, an option, on the contrary, it is a requirement.  This is the way it has always been.”

Roman Catholic Pope Saint Leo I

"For example, in the 5th Century one reads that no one should be allowed to call into question the belief which our Fathers received from the Apostles, as if there were any doubt what this is (Roman Catholic Pope Saint Leo I [Saturday, September 29, 440 - Thursday, November 10, 461], LETTER to Emperor Marcian at Constantinople, Monday, June 26, 451).”

“Keep the good deposit [i.e., the Deposit of Faith] committed to thy trust by the Holy Ghost, Who dwelleth in us”  (2 Timothy 1:14).

“Hold the traditions which you have learned”  (2 Thessalonians 2:14).

“But though We, or an Angel from Heaven, preach to you a Gospel besides that which We have preached to you; let him be anathema” (Galatians 1:8).

Further Considerations

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

“‘All ceremonies are Professions of Faith, in which the interior worship of God consists.  Now man can make profession of his inward faith, by deeds as well as by words; and in either profession, if he makes a false declaration, he sins mortally... Consequently, just as it would be a mortal sin now for anyone, in making a profession of faith, to say that Christ is yet to be born, which the fathers of old said devoutly and truthfully; so too, it would be a mortal sin now to observe those ceremonies which the fathers of old fulfilled with devotion and fidelity. Such is the teaching of Augustine (CONTRA FAUST. xix.16)” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part I-II, Question 103, Article 4).”

The very fact that “All ceremonies are Professions of Faith, in which the interior worship of God consists” (Op. Cit.), is the theological and liturgical basis for the axiom, previously anticipated over 800 years before by the Roman Catholic Pope Saint Celestine I [Saturday, September 10, 422  - Tuesday, July 27, 432 ] who taught the principle:  Legem Credendi Lex Statuit Supplicandi - The Liturgical form of prayer becomes the standard of Faith.

This is sometimes shortened to simply Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi:  The Law of Praying is the Law of Believing.  This simply means that you declare, by a public, exterior liturgical act of worship, both your own personal interior beliefs of your faith and your own personal interior worship of God, externally expressed in public worship ceremonies.  Thus, you pray what you believe and you believe what you pray.

But how could the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope, Celestine I, teach this profound theological-liturgical axiom IF there were two contradictory liturgical rites in his days?

The first being the Catholic Traditional Holy SACRIFICE of the Mass which contains the unchangeable ontological essence and the unchangeable metaphysical essence of the Mass as Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, had perfectly instituted it, and which is offered by the Mass Celebrant (Prelate - Priest) on an “Altar” facing God, as a Mediator between God and mankind - with his back to the people on whose behalf he is mediating for them with Almighty God.

The second being the totally Protestant “non-mass” (an “anti-mass”) which was imperfectly instituted by finite men who, anticipating the axiom of Martin Luther - “Tolle Missam, Tolle Ecclesiam” - Take away the Mass, and you Destroy the Church, deliberately threw out the unchangeable ontological essence and the unchangeable metaphysical essence of the Mass as Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, had perfectly instituted it, and replaced these required essences with only an “anti-mass” - a mere memorial supper meal which is performed by the “President of the Assembly” on a “table” facing the people with his back to Almighty God.

Sad to say, unlike the days of the Infallible Roman Catholic Pope Saint Celestine I [Saturday, September 10, 422  - Tuesday, July 27, 432 ] in which there was only ONE Liturgical Rite for the Catholic Traditional Holy SACRIFICE of the Mass which did in fact contain the unchangeable ontological essence and the unchangeable metaphysical essence of the Mass as Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, had perfectly instituted it, today there are two “competing masses” and hence, by definition - de facto - in virtue of Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi - two different “churches”:

The first being the Catholic Traditional Holy SACRIFICE of the Mass which contains the unchangeable ontological essence and the unchangeable metaphysical essence of the Mass as Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, had perfectly instituted it, and which is found in the Catholic Church which has descended into Catacombs III and which is offered by the Mass Celebrant (Prelate - Priest) on an “Altar” facing God, as a Mediator between God and mankind - with his back to the people on whose behalf he is mediating for them with Almighty God.

The second being the totally Protestant “non-mass” (an “anti-mass”) which was imperfectly instituted by finite men who accepted and used the axiom of Martin Luther - “Tolle Missam, Tolle Ecclesiam” - Take away the Mass, and you Destroy the Church.  This explains why they deliberately threw out the unchangeable ontological essence and the unchangeable metaphysical essence of the Mass as Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, had perfectly instituted it.

Today, this “NEW mass”, which is actually - de facto - a modernized, updated, synthesized 16th Century Protestant “non-mass” (an “anti-mass”) is found in the SatanicX Vatican 2 church   which has illegally confiscated the church buildings which used to belong to the Catholic Church (hence the real reason why the Catholic Church has been forced to descend into Catacombs III), consists of only an updated 16th Century Protestant memorial supper meal which is performed by the “President of the Assembly” on a “table” facing the people with his back to Almighty God and His Holy Altar of SACRIFICE.

Father Barbara writes explaining how this Law of Believing is the Law of Praying works today:

"The liturgy is the Faith lived by the faithful.  Heretical speculations disturb simple people but little, for they are, for the most part, not aware of the theological theories.  On the other hand, however, all of the faithful--children and adults, simple people and intellectuals--are alike formed (or deformed) by the formulas of prayer which they recite, by the singing and the music they hear, by the devotions which they practice,  by the readings and commentaries to which they listen, by the form of worship which they live:  in a word, by the liturgy in which they take part.  This is why heretics all down the ages have always sought to make use of the liturgy, because they have seen in it the easiest and most effective means of giving currency to their errors, and of changing the faith of the people in the direction of their [subtle] innovations”  (Father Noel Barbara, magazine Fortes in Fide, Special Issue, “The Mass”, Volume 1, # 4).

Why does this process of gradual deception work?

By seeing everything, we finally tolerate anything, and tolerating anything finally leads us to approve everything”  (Bishop Saint Augustine, a.k.a. Aurelius Augustinus [b. Tagaste, Africa, Saturday, November 13, 354 A.D. - d. Hippo Regia, Africa, Wednesday, August 28, 430 A.D.], Bishop of Hippo Regia, Father and Doctor of the Catholic Church, the Doctor of Grace, a protégé of Patriarch Saint Ambrose [b. in Gaul, possibly at Trier, Arles, or Lyons in 340 A.D. - d. at Milan, Italy on Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.] Patriarch of Milan [374 A.D. - Friday, April 4, 397 A.D.], secondary source, Father Noel Barbara, magazine Fortes in Fide, Volume 1, No. 3, p. 156, footnote # 11)

“Why does the Mass keep changing?  Here is the answer... It would have been foolhardy to introduce all the changes at once.  It was obviously wise to change gradually and gently.  If all the changes had been introduced together, you would have been shocked! [Editor:  Not to mention the fact that the changes would never have been accepted!]” (John Carmel Cardinal Heenan [b. at Ilford, England on Thursday, January 26, 1905 - d. at Westminster, England, on Friday, November 7, 1975], Lenten Pastoral Letter, October 12, 1969).

Why?

Because:

“The power of a Sacrament is from God alone,...Therefore, GOD ALONE CAN INSTITUTE A SACRAMENT” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 64, Article 2).

“The Apostles and their successors are God’s vicars in governing the Church which is built on faith and the sacraments of faith.  Wherefore, just as they may not institute another Church, so neither may they deliver another faith, nor institute other sacraments”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 64, Article 2, Reply to Objection 3).

Protestant Heretic
Archbishop Thomas Cranmer

Of course you remember that part of the nature of the Mass is that it is a Sacrament.  For a person to sit down, as did the Protestant Heretic Archbishop Thomas Cranmer [b. Nottinghamshire, England in 1489 A.D. - d. burnt at the stake in Oxford, England in 1556 A.D.] and write the Anglican Rite in what is known as the “First Prayer Book of Edward VI of 1549” and then update it with the “Second Prayer Book of Edward VI in 1552”, and, as have the modern day anti-Catholic infiltrator-heretics of the   Satanic Vatican 2 church, whose prose is more heretical than even that of Thomas Cranmer, to try to “institute a sacrament” only brings down upon themselves the wrath of God (Leviticus 10:1-2; 1 Paralipomenon 24:2).

After all:

“The Apostles and their successors are God’s vicars in governing the Church which is built on faith and the sacraments of faith.  Wherefore, just as THEY MAY NOT INSTITUTE ANOTHER CHURCH, so neither may they deliver another Faith

[lex orandi, lex credendi - the law of praying is the law of believing:  IF people can write their own ‘mass’ then in effect they establish their very own faith and religion!],

nor institute other [i.e. phony] sacraments; on the contrary, the Church is said to be built up with the Sacraments which flowed from the side of Christ while hanging on the Cross”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 64, Article 2, Reply to Objection 3).

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

IF any further proof is needed, consider that:

“Ambrose says (DE SACRAM. iv):

The Consecration is accomplished by the words and expressions of their Lord Jesus...when the time comes for perfecting the Sacrament, THE PRIEST USES NO LONGER HIS OWN WORDS, BUT THE WORDS OF

[no, its not the disciples of the religion of atheistic pagans secular humanism who make up their own ‘mass’ and/or other ‘sacraments’ like their ‘vows of matrimony’]

CHRIST.  Therefore, IT IS CHRIST’S WORDS

[not the words of Synod Vatican 2 or of 2nd Pope John 23rd , or of Paul 6, or J-P 1, or J-P 2, or some other member - whether Clergy, Religious, or Laity - of the  SatanicX Vatican 2 church]

THAT PERFECT THIS SACRAMENT’”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 78, Article 1).

Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X

“38. ..it is abundantly clear how great and how eager is the passion of such men for INNOVATION. In all Catholicism there is absolutely nothing on which it does not fasten.They wish philosophy to be reformed.. Scholastic Philosophy to be relegated to the history of philosophy.. young men.. taught modern philosophy which alone is true and suited to the times in which we live. They desire the reform of theology.. [with] modern philosophy for its foundation.. history.. must be written and taught only according to their methods.. In the Catechism no dogmas are to be inserted except those that have been reformed and are within the capacity of the people. Regarding worship, they say, the number of external devotions is to he reduced, and steps must be taken to prevent their further increase.. a share in ecclesiastical government should.. be given to the lower ranks of the clergy and even to the laity.. authority which is too much concentrated should be decentralized.. With regard to morals, they adopt the principle of the AMERICANISTS, that the active virtues are more important than the passive, and are to be more encouraged in practice.. the Clergy should return to their primitive humility and poverty, and that in their ideas and action they should admit the principles of Modernism... What is there left in the Church which is not to be reformed by them and according to their principles?”  (Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists, Sunday, September 8, 1907).

So now, today, We see - with many exceptions - primarily filling up Catacombs III -  the sad spectacle of brainwashed Catholics who have been so viciously victimized that they do not even have a clue (with some exceptions) that they no longer have a valid and lawful Catholic Rite of Mass and  that they are no longer attending a Catholic Church, even though the church buildings, in most cases, are still the same buildings in which their Grandparents and Parents assisted at a valid and lawful Catholic Rite of Mass long before the CONVENTION of anti-Catholic infiltrators that began in 1962 and which is called “Synod Vatican 2", a.k.a. “Council Vatican 2”, and that they are no longer “Catholics” - except in name only - not in regard to their Faith, not in regard to their Mass, and not in regard to their Sacraments - all of which are now anti-Catholic!!!   Except for the many exceptions primarily filling up Catacombs III, it was all done so easily because of their own gross ignorance of, and/or culpable indifference towards, their unchangeable Holy Catholic Faith!

"The New Mass is a different liturgy.  This needs to be said without ambiguity.  The Roman Rite, as we knew it, no longer exists. It has been destroyed!" (Father Joseph Gelineau S.J. [b. at Champ-sur-Layon, Maine-et-Loire, West-Central France, on Sunday, October 31, 1920 - d. at Sallanches, a commune in the Haute-Savoie  department in the Rhône-Alps, South-Eastern France, on Friday, August 8, 2008].   He was a Synod Vatican 2 peritus - expert - who helped to make up the NOR along with other anti-Catholics and the 6 Protestants.  He was, of course, a professional apologist for the NOR.  This quotation is from his book - Demain La Liturgk, Paris, 1976, pp. 9-10; emphasis added).

But should you not expect this?  After all, the NOR has become a "permanent workshop" - i.e. always changing, always evolving, like all other Modernist junk because "evolution" is the ONLY Dogma of Modernist Heretics - to quote Father Joseph Gelineau, S.J., - one of, if not  THE  MOST,  RADICAL member of the Concilium that made up the NOR along with the 6 Protestants!

(“The Lord’s Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God, with a priest PRESIDING, to celebrate the memorial of the lord.  [12]” [THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, April 6, 1969, Benno Walter Cardinal Gut - b. ?  - d. at Rome, Italy on December 8, 1970 - Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, ¶ 7; emphasis added.  N.B. A President “presides”.]

“Moreover, the prayers addressed to God by the priest who presides over the assembly in the person of Christ are said in the name of the entire holy people and of all present.  And the visible signs used by the liturgy to signify invisible divine things have been chosen by Christ or the Church.  Thus not only when things are read 'which were written for our instruction’ [Rom. 15:4], but also when the Church prays or sings or acts, the faith of those taking part is nourished and their minds are raised to God, so that they may offer Him their rational service and more abundantly receive His grace.”  (Constitution on the Liturgy, ¶ 33; emphasis added.  N.B.  The term “the priest who presides over the assembly” makes him the “President of the Assembly”.  In other words,  the “President of the Assembly” is the one “who presides over the assembly” no matter who that person is, whether a “priest” or a “non-priest”.)

(THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, April 6, 1969, Benno Walter Cardinal Gut - b. ?  - d. at Rome, Italy on December 8, 1970 - Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, ¶ 7; emphasis added.),

What EXACTLY does the memorial of the Lord really mean?  Think about it!

For example, it could mean:

3) Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

 

4) A Crucifix.

"Evangelium"
5) Book of The Gospels.

6) A picture or an icon of Jesus Christ.
 

7) etc.!

“That which signifies many things is an ambiguous sign and consequently occasions deception; this is clearly seen in equivocal words.  But all deception should be removed from the Christian religion according to Col. 2:8:  `Beware, lest any man cheat you by [false] philosophy and vain deceit’”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 60, Article 3, Reply to Objection 1).

Yet Christ says of Himself:  “I am the Truth.” (John 14:6).  But deception is NOT the Truth!

Therefore, the SatanicX Vatican 2 church   not only officially teaches lies, it also does not have Christ, the Truth, in a moral sense.

In addition, the SatanicX Vatican 2 church  does not have Christ in a material sense either because by its deception via ambiguity and equivocity it DENIES the dogma of the Truth of the TRANSUBSTANTIATION as it is found in the Deposit of Faith in the Catholic Church!

This means that by its very definition, the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite - is NOT the Mass instituted by Jesus Christ Who is the Truth!  Hence, it is NOT a true, real, valid Mass!  It is, in other words, by its very definition, the NOR is NOT a Mass at all!

On the contrary, it is only a memorial of the Lord  which could possibly be a bronze plaque which was placed in a cemetery in Rome, or someplace else, by the President of the Consilium which made up the Novus Ordo Rite, which stands beside many other such bronze plaques also set in cemeteries as a memorial for the dead, or perhaps for a certain group of dead such as those who died in a certain war or during an extermination holocaust, e.g. the 7 million Ukrainian men, women and children who were martyred for the Holy Catholic Faith by the atheist Communist Stalin during the 1930’s!

In addition, the holocaust of over 20 million Russians, many of them members of the Orthodox Church, was likewise masterminded by the Communist Stalin in the 1930’s!

WHERE do you think the Nazi butcher Hitler got his idea for his holocaust of a few million?  From Stalin!

The GENERAL answer to these two questions is given above.  Now We will give a somewhat more precise answer to these two questions.

The Communio  (Episcopal Union) of Prelates, - Bishops (i.e. Bishops of whatever Rank of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction - Bishops, Archbishops, Metropolitan Archbishops, Primates, etc.), of the Catholic Church declares:

We Bishops believe today what the first Bishops - the Apostles - believed yesterday.*

We Bishops teach today what the first Bishops - the Apostles - taught yesterday.*

We Bishops preach today what the first Bishops - the Apostles - preached yesterday.*

We Bishops use today the same ontological essence, and the same metaphysical essence, of the Catholic Traditional Rite of Mass, as perfectly and immutably instituted by Jesus Christ, which the first Bishops - the Apostles - used yesterday.*

We Bishops use today the same ontological essence, and the same metaphysical essence, of the Catholic Traditional Rite for the administration of each of the Seven Sacraments, as perfectly and immutably instituted by Jesus Christ, which the first Bishops - the Apostles - used yesterday.*

We Bishops reject today the same errors and heresies the first Bishops - the Apostles - rejected yesterday.*

(*Yesterday means during the life-time of the Apostles up to the death of the last Apostle, Saint John at Ephesus in about the year 101 A.D.)

(“I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end” - Apocalypse 22:13),

(“Jesus Christ yesterday, and today, and the same forever” - Hebrews 13:8-9),

(“I am the Lord and I change not” - Malachias 2:6),

(“I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life” - John 14:6).

“God said to Moses: I AM WHO AM. He said: Thus shalt thou say to the children of Israel: HE WHO IS, hath sent me to you” (Exodus 3:14).

(N.B.  “I AM WHO AM” means that “I am being itself, eternal, self-existent, independent, infinite; without beginning, end, or change; and the source of all other beings”.

“The Word of our Lord endureth forever” (Isaias 40:8).

“For I am the Lord, and I change not” (Malachias 3:6).

“Amen, amen I say to you:  If any man keep My word, he shall not see death for ever” (John 8:51).

“Every best gift, and every perfect gift, is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with Whom there is no change, nor shadow of alteration” (James 1:17).

From Church Councils

“We have only one doctrine; this is the Faith of the Doctors of the Church; this is the Faith of the Holy Apostles; this is the Faith which has saved the world”  (Fourth Œcumenical Council, the First Council of Chalcedon [Sunday, October 8, 451 A.D. -  Wednesday, November 1, 451 A.D.]).

Seventh Œcumenical Council
The Second Council of Nicæa

“We preserve the teachings of the Fathers [of the Church]; We anathematize those who add or subtract anything” (Seventh Œcumenical Council, the Second Council of Nicæa [Thursday, September 24, 787 A.D. - Friday, October 23, 787 A.D.]).

“If anyone rejects all ecclesiastical Tradition, either written or unwritten:  let him be anathema” (Seventh Œcumenical Council, the Second Council of Nicæa [Thursday, September 24, 787 A.D. - Friday, October 23, 787 A.D.]).

“Those therefore who after the manner of wicked heretics dare to set aside Ecclesiastical Traditions, and to invent any kind of novelty, or to reject any of those things entrusted to the Church, or who wrongfully and outrageously devise the destruction of any of those Traditions enshrined in the Catholic Church, are to be punished thus:  if they are Bishops, We order them to be deposed; but if they are Monks or Lay Persons, We command them to be excluded from the community” (Seventh Œcumenical Council, the Second Council of Nicæa [Thursday, September 24, 787 A.D. - Friday, October 23, 787 A.D.]).

From The Fathers of the Catholic Church
 

Bishop Saint Irenæus of Lyons

“The whole Church which is throughout the whole world possesses ONE and the SAME Faith” (Bishop Saint Irenæus [b. Proconsular Asia c. 130 A.D. - d. Lyons, France either on Monday, June 28, or Monday, August 23, in about 202 A.D.], Bishop of Lyons, Father of the Catholic Church.  He was a Disciple of Bishop Saint Polycarp [c. 69 A.D. - d. martyred on Saturday, February 23, 166 A.D.].  Saint Polycarp, in turn, was a Disciple of Saint John the Apostle, Evangelist and author of the Apocalypse [b.  ?  A.D. - d. Ephesus, c. 101 A.D.], who made Saint Polycarp the Bishop of Smyrna.  Saint Polycarp is an Apostolic Father of the Catholic Church.  This quotation is from Bishop Saint Irenæus, Against the Heresies, {written 180 A.D. - 199 A.D.}, Book I, chapter 10, ¶ 3; emphasis added).

“If we return to the head and source of Divine Tradition, human error ceases” (Bishop Saint Cyprian of Carthage, a.k.a. Thaschus Cæcilius Cyprianus, [b. 190  A.D. - d. Martyred on Saturday, August 14, 258 A.D.]. He converted to the Catholic Church later in his life time.  He was Ordained a Priest in 247 A.D. and Consecrated as the Bishop of Carthage in about 249 A.D.), EPISTLE LXXIII, to Pompey, Against the Epistle of Stephen about the Baptism of Heretics, ¶ 10; emphasis added.)

Patriarch Saint Athanasius of Alexandria

“But God’s Word is one and the same and, as it is written: The Word of our Lord endureth forever [Isaias 40:8] unchanged, not before or after another, but existing the same always.  For it was fitting, whereas God is One, that His Image should be One also, and His Word One and One His Wisdom” (Patriarch Saint Athanasius [b. Alexandria, Egypt 296 A.D. - d. Alexandria, Egypt on Wednesday, May 2, 373A.D.], Patriarch of Alexandria, Egypt, Father of Orthodoxy in the Catholic Church, Four Discourses Against the Arians, Discourse II, Chapter XVII, Introduction to Proverbs viii. 22, Continued, ¶ 36;emphasis added).

“Revealed Truth, to be what it professes, must have an uninterrupted descent from the Apostles.  Its teachers must be unanimous and persistent in their unanimity and it must bear no human master's name as its designation”  (Patriarch Saint Athanasius [b. Alexandria, Egypt 296 A.D. - d. Alexandria, Egypt on Wednesday, May 2, 373A.D.], Patriarch of Alexandria, Egypt, Father of Orthodoxy in the Catholic Church.  Defender of the Catholic Faith against the Arian heresy at the First Œcumenical Council, the First Council of Nicæa (Council of Nicæa I [Saturday, June 20, 325 A.D. - Tuesday, August 25, 325 A.D.]; emphasis added).

Father Saint Vincent of Lerins

“Magnopere curandum est ut id teneamus quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est.  Care must especially be had that that be held, which was believed everywhere, always, and by all”  (Father Saint Vincent of Lerins [b. Toul, France, c. 400 A.D. - d. Island of Lerins, c. 450 A.D.], A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter 3; Rouet de Journel, #2168; emphasisadded).

“In an epistle sent at the time to Africa, he [Pope Saint Stephen I [Friday, May 12, 254 - Sunday, August 2, 257] laid down this rule: Let there be no innovation - nothing but what has been handed down”.  For that holy and prudent man well knew that true piety admits no other rule than that whatsoever things have been faithfully received from our Fathers the same are to be faithfully consigned to posterity. It is our duty to follow Religion, not to make Religion follow us.  The proper characteristic of Christians is not to impose their own beliefs or observances upon posterity, but to preserve and keep what we have received from those who went before us. What then was the issue of the whole matter? What but the usual and customary one? Antiquity was retained, novelty [i.e. change] was rejected”  (Father Saint Vincent of Lerins, A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter VI, ¶ 16; emphasis added).

“Only those opinions of the Fathers are to be brought forward which were expressed by those who lived, taught and persevered in the holy Catholic faith and communion, and who deserved either to die faithfully in Christ or to be martyred gloriously for Him.  Those men are to be believed, moreover, in accordance with the following rule:  Only that is to be held as certain, valid and beyond doubt, which either ALL or MOST of them have confirmed in one and the same sense-manifestly, frequently, and persistently, as though a council of masters stood in agreement-and which they have accepted, kept, and handed on.  On the other hand, what some saint, learned man, bishop, confessor, or martyr has individually thought outside of, or even contrary to, the general opinion must be considered his personal, particular, and quite private opinion, entirely removed from the common public and general opinion”  (Father Saint Vincent of Lerins, A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter 28).

“The Church of Christ, zealous and cautious guardian of the dogmas deposited with it, never changes any phase of them.  It does not diminish them or add to them; it neither trims what seems necessary nor grafts things superfluous; it neither gives up its own nor usurps what does not belong to it.  But it devotes all its diligence to one aim; to treat Tradition faithfully and wisely; to nurse and polish what from old times may have remained unshaped and unfinished; to consolidate and to strengthen what already was clear and plain; and to guard what already was confirmed and defined.”  (Father Saint Vincent of Lerins, A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter 33; emphasisadded.)

Bishop Saint Isidore of Seville

“Heresy is so-called from the Greek word meaning ‘choice’, by which each chooses according to his own will what he pleases to teach or believe.  BUT WE ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BELIEVE WHATEVER WE CHOOSE, NOR TO CHOOSE WHATEVER SOMEONE ELSE HAS BELIEVED.    We have the Apostles of God as authorities, who did not themselves of their own will choose what they would believe, but faithfully transmitted to the nations the teaching received from Christ.  So, even if an Angel from Heaven should preach otherwise, he shall be called anathema”(Bishop Saint Isidore of Seville [b. Cartagena, Spain 560 A.D. - d. Seville, Spain, 636 A.D.], Bishop of Seville, Doctor of the Catholic Church, ETYMOLOGIES, 8, 3; emphasis added).

Father Saint John Damascene

“We do not change the everlasting boundaries which our Fathers have set, but we keep the [Apostolic] Tradition, just as we received it.” (Father Saint John Damascene, a.k.a. Saint John of Damascus, [b. Damascus, Syria 676 A.D. - c. 770 A.D.; Last of the Greek Fathers of the Catholic Church], ON ICONS 11, 12; found in Jacques Paul Migne [b. Saint-Flour, France on Saturday, October 25, 1800 A.D. - d. Paris, France on  Sunday, October 24, 1875 A.D.], Patrologiæ Graecæ Cursus Completus, 2nd series, published in 166 volumes [1857 A.D. - 1866 A.D.], Volume XCIV [94], Column 1297B; emphasis added.)

“Hold firmly that our Faith is IDENTICAL with that of the Ancients.  Deny this, and you dissolve the unity of the Church” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Disputations Concerning Truth, 14,12; emphasis added).

“The articles of faith stand in the same relation to the doctrine of faith, as self-evident principles to a teaching based on natural reason.  Among these principles there is a certain order, so that some are contained implicitly in others; thus all principles are reduced, as to their first principle, to this one: The same thing cannot be affirmed and denied at the same time, as the Philosopher states (Metaph. iv, text. 9).  In like manner all the articles are contained implicitly in certain primary matters of faith, such as God’s existence, and His providence, over the salvation of man, according to Heb. xi:  He that cometh to God, must believe that He is, and is a rewarder to them that seek Him.  For the existence of God includes all that we believe to exist in God eternally and in these our happiness consists; while belief in His providence includes all those things which God dispenses in time, for man’s salvation, and which are the way to that happiness; and in this way, again, some of those articles which follow from these are contained in others: thus faith in the Redemption of mankind includes belief in the Incarnation of Christ, His Passion and so forth.”

“Accordingly we must conclude that, as regards the substance of the articles of faith, they have not received any increase as time went on: since whatever those who lived later have believed, was contained, albeit implicitly, in the faith of those Fathers who preceded them.  But there was an increase in the number of articles believed explicitly, since to those who lived in later times some were known explicitly which were not known explicitly by those who lived before them... the Apostle says (Eph. iii. 5) that the mystery of Christ, in other generations was not known... as it is now revealed to His holy Apostles and Prophets” (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 1, Article 7; emphasis added).

We Challenge the Current Pope
of the SatanicXVatican 2 church
to a Public Debate, Live on International TV

Just as We publicly challenged Pope Paul 6, Pope JP-1 and Pope JP-2, so also, now, for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Immortal Souls, We hereby publicly challenge the current Pope of  the   Satanic X Vatican 2 church to a public debate, live on International TV, exclusively in English, just the two of us.

No one else except the Pope may make use of a Translator if he desires - on the subject of the so-called “NEW mass”, a.k.a. the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. Novus Ordo Missæ, concerning why he thinks this “NEW mass” is “valid” based upon the solid Catholic Traditional sciences of Scholastic Philosophy and Thomistic Theology and, what for all Roman Catholics, are the unchangeable Dogmatic teachings and the unchangeable Dogmatic Canons and Decrees of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, including - but not limited to -  Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562.

This was issued conjointly under the infallibility of the Dogmatic Roman Catholic Council of Trent and also under Papal infallibility, which solemnly promulgated the said unchangeable Dogmatic teachings and the unchangeable Dogmatic Canons and Decrees of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent in the person of His Holiness, the Roman Catholic Pope, Pius IV, Giovanni Angelo De Medici [Friday, December 25, 1559 - Thursday, December 9, 1565].

Let no one presume to take offense that We have herewith challenged the current Pope of the   SatanicX Vatican 2 church, but rather to learn from this wise Counsel of the Angelic Doctor who cites the Apostle:

“(An example was given) to Prelates [Bishops of whatever rank of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction] of humility, so that they would not refuse to accept rebukes from their inferiors and subjects; and to subjects (was given) an example of zeal and freedom, so that they would not fear to correct their prelates, above all, when the crime was public and redounded to the danger of many...The rebuke was just and useful, its motive was not light:  it was a question of a danger to the preservation of the evangelical Truth... The manner in which the rebuke was given was appropriate, for it was public and manifest.  For this reason, Saint Paul writes:  “I spoke to Cephas,” (that is, to Peter) “before all,” for the simulation practiced by Peter redounded to the peril of all”  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Ad Galatians, 2:11-14, lecture III, no. 77, 83-84).

Saint Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles
CORRECTED the Roman Catholic HERETIC Pope, St. Peter!!!

Therefore, We follow the excellent example of the Holy Apostle, Saint Paul, who writes:

“But when Cephas [Peter] was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed  [i.e. he was a HERETIC!]... But when I saw that they walked not uprightly unto the Truth of the Gospel, I said to Cephas before them all...” (Galatians 2:11; 2:14).

“In order to resist and defend oneself no authority is required.... Therefore, just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff who attacks the body, so it is licit to resist him who attacks souls, or who disturbs the civil order, or, above all, who tries to destroy the Church.  It is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and by impeding the execution of his will” (Saint Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, S.J. [b. Montepulciano, Italy, on Sunday, October 4, 1542 A.D. - d. Rome, Italy, on Friday, September 17, 1621 A.D.], Doctor of the Church, De Romano Pontifice, II, 29).

  Jacobus Maria DeJesus, C.M.F., D.D.

Autocephalous Patriarch of the Ancient Roman Rite of the Catholic Church.

What happens to those who CHANGE what is of DIVINE Institution as the Scripture testifies?

"And Nadab and Abiu, the Sons of Aaron, taking their censers, put fire therein, and incense on it, offering before the Lord strange fire: which was not commanded them.  And fire coming out from the Lord destroyed them: and they died before the Lord" (Leviticus 10:1-2).

"Nadab and Abiu died before their father" (1 Paralipomenon 24:2).

Nadab and Abiu CHANGED the Old Testament Sacrifice
Divinely Instituted by God the Father

History Repeats Itself!

Pope JP-2, the GREAT HERETIC and the GREAT APOSTATE,
ReplacedThe Holy Sacrifice of the Mass
Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by God the Son, Jesus Christ
With, among others, these abominations of desolation:

 

The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Which God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted. X

The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Was CHANGED and totally DESTROYED,  Not only by Pope Paul 6,  But also by Pope JP-2, the GREAT Heretic and the GREAT Apostate, and REPLACED by the "NEW mass", the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite Which Heretics and Apostates finitely instituted!

Dear Priests and Prelates:

All of Us Have Only ONE of Two Choices

WHERE Will YOU Spend YOUR Eternity?

Answers:

IN HELL - IF You Use any/all Versions of the NOR!
and
IN HELL - IF You Remain in the   SatanicX Vatican 2 church!

“And in the half of the week the Victim and the Sacrifice [The UNCHANGEABLE Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE Metaphysical Essence of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ which are found in The Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites.] shall fail:  and there shall be in the Temple the Abomination of Desolation: [The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae] and the Desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end” (Daniel  9:27; emphasis added).

“And they shall defile the Sanctuary of Strength, and shall take away the Continual Sacrifice [The UNCHANGEABLE Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE Metaphysical Essence of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ which are found in The Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites.], and they shall place there the Abomination unto desolation[The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae]” (Daniel  11:31; emphasis added).

On Saturday, November 27, 1902, the 72nd anniversary of the Miraculous Medal Apparition [Saturday, November 27, 1830], Our Lord warned of the conspiracy of evil people which was already inventing a NEW liturgy - this was in 1902!!! - to replace the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which He had PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted:

“I give you a warning. The disciples who are not of My Gospel are now working hard to remake, according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls [Satan], a mass that contains words which are odious in My Sight. When the fatal hour arrives where the faith of My Priests are put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated, in this second period.”

“The first period is the one of My Priesthood, existing since Me. The second is the one of the persecution, when the enemies of the Faith and of Holy Religion will impose their formulas in the book of the second celebration. These infamous spirits are those who crucified me and are awaiting the kingdom of the New Messias.  Many of My holy Priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss. Unfortunately, amongst them are those who will accept it.”

"according to their ideas, and under the influence of the enemy of souls [Satan], a mass [The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae] that contains words which are odious in My Sight".

"When the fatal hour arrives where the faith of My Priests are put to the test, it will be these texts that will be celebrated".

"... the enemies of the [Catholic] Faith and of Holy Religion will impose their formulas [these texts] in the book of the second celebration".

Jesus Christ prophecized that not all Priests would accept the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae.  Catholic Priests and Bishops who are faithful to their Holy Vocation to the Holy Priesthood continue to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as it is found in Missals printed in 1943 and earlier in what is called "Catacombs III which is to be found around the world!  They reject all other missals printed for use in the Roman Rite which were printed in 1944 and thereafter!

Jesus Christ tells everyone that the various "missals" of the various versions (e.g. Latin, Spanish, French, German, English, Polish, Italian, etc.) of the NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae are "sealed with the words of" Hell, i.e. "of the abyss".

Jesus Christ also prophecized that there would be Priests who would "accept" "this book, sealed with the words of the abyss", which automatically also includes all of those missals printed in 1944, 1950, 1955, 1956, 1960, 1962, 1969, etc., etc.!

"Many of My holy Priests will refuse this book, sealed with the words of the abyss. Unfortunately, amongst them are those who will accept it.”

There is no other historical set of facts which perfectly and totally - 100% - fit these prophecies of Jesus Christ in 1902!

In 1904 A.D. The Blessed Virgin Mary Prophecized
NEW clergy, NEW liturgy, NEW sacraments, NEW...

Our Blessed Mother

“They will not stop on this hateful and sacrilegious road. They will go further to compromise all at once, and in one blow, the Holy Church, the Clergy, and the Faith of my children.”

dispersion of the pastors

true Pastors, who will be replaced by others formed by Hell:

“...NEW preachers of NEW sacraments, NEW temples, NEW baptisms, NEW confraternities.”

She announced that the "True Pastors" would "be replaced by others formed by Hell".  This seems to allude to the fact that Synod Vatican 2 was a CONVENTION of Communist, Freemasonic, Modernist heretics, Satanists, and Pedophiles who had INFILTRATED the Roman Catholic Church in the early part of the 1900's!

This also refers to the fact that those Priests and Bishops who refused to accept and/or to use all of the anti-Catholic Satanic changes to the Mass and the Sacraments were kicked out - with no place to go and, apparently in some cases, without getting their pensions?!

Some of these Priests and Prelates quickly became the nucleus of the Clergy in Catacombs III and their courage and fortitude to continue to Offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and to administer the Seven Sacraments, according to the Ancient Roman Rite, just as they had done before this CONVENTION of God-Haters and Catholic-Haters in Synod Vatican 2.

The prophecy about the "NEW sacraments... NEW baptisms" clearly refers to the many changes and ultimate destruction of the Ritual books used by Prelates (Pontificale Romanum) and by Priests (Rituale Romanum).

There is no other historical set of facts which perfectly and totally - 100% - fit these prophecies of the Blessed Virgin Mary in 1904!

Dear Priests and Prelates:

Those of you who do not agree with the above, must be aware of the fact that you are automatically suspected of being a member of one or more groups of anti-Catholic Infiltrators who did nothing but CHANGE and DESTROY the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which was PERFECTLY and DIVINELY instituted by Jesus Christ, along with the Seven Sacraments!

Further, you are also automatically suspected of being members of that group of Pastors..... formed by Hell, not to mention being disciples who are not of [Christ's] Gospel, and who deliberately use a mass that contains words which are odious in [Christ's] Sight!!!

But, for those of you who do agree with the above:

IF you are still using the NOR - whether for "mass" or administering "sacraments", immediately stop using this Satanic rite which is sealed with the words of the abyss!!

IF you are still in the  SatanicX Vatican 2 church  - leave immediately!  The soul you save must first be your own, then the souls of your parishioners.

Search for Catacombs III near you and present yourself to one of the Catholic Prelates in Catacombs III to see IF you need to be Ordained sub conditione - which will have to happen IF you were "ordained" with the NEW rite.

You would also need to be Ordained sub conditione - which will have to happen IF you were "ordained" by a Prelate who used the Ancient Roman Rite as found in the Pontificale Romanum printed before 1944, but which Bishop or Archbishop did not validly receive the Sacrament of the Episcopacy himself.

Today, the classical example is the case of "Archbishop Lefebvre" who, according to various alleged "documents", had been "ordained" a "priest" by a Prelate who was, at that time, an 18th degree Freemason, and who had been "consecrated" a "bishop" by the very same Prelate who was, at that time, a 32nd degree Freemason!

This means that, IF the alleged "documents" are true, then not only are none of the "priests" and none of the "bishops" who were "ordained" and/or "consecrated" by the said "Archbishop Lefebvre, valid "priests" and/or "bishops" (they are merely laymen wearing Roman collars), but all of their "masses" are per se invalid and all of the "sacraments" they administer, are per se invalid, etc., etc.

Based upon the steady stream of "priests" especially, and of some "bishops", of "Archbishop Lefebvre" who have appeared at the doors of various Catholic Prelates in Catacombs III, it seems logical to conclude that said "Lefebvre clergy" themselves recognize the alleged fact that they are only Laymen - at least this is what some of the "Lefebvre clergy" it has been claimed are telling some of the Catacombs III Catholic Prelates?!

But all of the Catholic Prelates thus far contacted for the sub conditione have, insofar as it is known at present, have all refused any sub conditione, citing as one huge reason - the extremely defective seminary training of the said "Lefebvre clergy" which it has been admitted - at least by some of the said "Lefebvre clergy" - is not done according to the requirements of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent!

Unfortunately, the same situation prevails with some other "priests" who are the members of various other "groups" and/or so-called "traditional catholic" organizations!

This is the situation with those who most especially never attended a pre-Synod Vatican 2 seminary and the validity of whose "bishop(s)" is highly questionable at best!  However, there are some Prelates in Catacombs III who tend to be a little more "open" to a few of them - but only on a case-by-case basis, with various conditions which must be met - including a rigorous oral exam, for example!

---

We begin by observing that the Angelic Doctor has presented five proofs for the existence of God!

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church,  presents 5 arguments for the existence of God in his Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 2, Article 3, I Answer That.

He argues that God exists on the basis of:

1) movement:  The first and more manifest way is the argument from motion.
2) efficient cause:  The second way is from the nature of the efficient cause.
3) necessity (contingency):  The third way is taken from possibility and necessity.
4) hierarchy:  The fourth way is taken from the gradation to be found in things.
5) design:  The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world.

If movement is not self-explanatory, whether the movement is corporeal or spiritual, it necessitates a first mover.

Premise 1:  Things are in motion

Premise 2:  Motion = reduction from potentiality to actuality, i.e. something  moves if it changes from being potentially in motion to being actually in motion.

Premise 3: Only something in a state of actuality can reduce something else from a state of potentiality to actuality, i.e. only something actually  moving can make something else change from potentially moving to actually  moving.

Premise 4: A thing cannot be both potential and actual in the same respect, i.e. a thing cannot both be potentially moving and actually moving.

Premise 5:   Sub-Conclusion 1 from - Premise 2, Premise 3, and Premise 4:  A thing cannot move  itself.

Premise 6:   Sub-Conclusion 2 from - Premise 1, Premise 5:  A thing must be moved by something  else.

Premise 7:  The chain of movers cannot go on to infinity.

Conclusion:  There must be a first mover = God.

It is certain, and evident to our senses, that in the world some things are in motion. Now whatever is in motion is put in motion by another, for nothing can be in motion except it is in potentiality to that towards which it is in motion; whereas a thing moves inasmuch as it is in act. For motion is nothing else than the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be reduced from potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality. Thus that which is actually hot, as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot, and thereby moves and changes it.

Now it is not possible that the same thing should be at once in actuality and potentiality in the same respect, but only in different respects. For what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be potentially hot; but it is simultaneously potentially cold. It is therefore impossible that in the same respect and in the same way a thing should be both mover and moved, i.e. that it should move itself.

Therefore, whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another. If that by which it is put in motion be itself put in motion, then this also must needs be put in motion by another, and that by another again.

But this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and, consequently, no other mover; seeing that subsequent movers move only inasmuch as they are put in motion by the first mover; as the staff moves only because it is put in motion by the hand.

Therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.

If interconnected efficient causes are here and now actually operating, air and warmth, say, to preserve my life, then there must be a supreme cause from which here and now these causes derive their preservative causality.

Premise 1:  A thing cannot be the cause of itself.

Premise 2:  The chain of causes cannot go on to infinity

Premise 3:  If there is no first cause, there would be no effects.

Conclusion:  There is a first cause = God.

In the world of sense we find there is an order of efficient causes. There is no case known (neither is it, indeed, possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself; for so it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.

Now in efficient causes it is not possible to go on to infinity, because in all efficient causes following in order, the first is the cause of the intermediate cause, and the intermediate is the cause of the ultimate cause, whether the intermediate cause be several, or only one.

Now to take away the cause is to take away the effect. Therefore, if there be no first cause among efficient causes, there will be no ultimate, nor any intermediate cause. But if in efficient causes it is possible to go on to infinity, there will be no first efficient cause, neither will there be an ultimate effect, nor any intermediate efficient causes; all of which is plainly false.

Therefore it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.

If there exist contingent beings, which can cease to exist, then there must be a necessary being which cannot cease to exist, which of itself has existence, and which, here and now, gives existence to these contingent beings. If once nothing at all existed, there would not be now, or ever, anything at all in existence. To suppose all things contingent, that is, of themselves non-existent, is to suppose an absurdity.

Premise 1:  It is possible for anything in nature to be or not be, i.e. to exist or not to exist.

Premise 2:  If it is possible for something to be or not be, then it must have at some time not been, i.e. not existed.

Premise 3:   Sub-Conclusion:  If everything could be or not be, then it is possible that at one time nothing existed.

Premise 4:  Things are brought into existence by something that already exists.

Premise 5:  Sub-Conclusion 1 from - Premise 3, Premise 4:  If at one time nothing existed, then there would be nothing in existence now. But there are things in existence now.

Premise 6:  Sub-Conclusion 2: So, there must be something which exists necessarily.

Premise 7:  An infinite chain of necessary beings is impossible.

Conclusion:  Something must have its own necessity, its own contingency = God.

We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, since they are found to be generated, and to corrupt, and consequently, they are possible to be and not to be. But it is impossible for these always to exist, for that which is possible not to be at some time is not. Therefore, if everything is possible not to be, then at one time there could have been nothing in existence.

Now if this were true, even now there would be nothing in existence, because that which does not exist only begins to exist by something already existing.

Therefore, if at one time nothing was in existence, it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist; and thus even now nothing would be in existence - which is absurd.

Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary. But every necessary thing either has its necessity caused by another, or not.

Now it is impossible to go on to infinity in necessary things which have their necessity caused by another, as has been already proved in regard to efficient causes.

Therefore we cannot but postulate the existence of some being having of itself its own necessity, and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others their necessity. This all men speak of as God.

If there are beings in the world which differ in their degree of nobility, goodness, and truth, it is because they have but a share, a part, because they participate diversely, in existence, in nobility, goodness, and truth. Hence there is, in each of them, a composition, a union, between the subject which participates and the perfection, existence, goodness, truth, which are participated to them.

Now composition, union, presupposes the unity which it participates. (Quae secundum se diversa sunt non conveniunt in aliquod unum nisi per aliquam causam, adunantem ipsa. Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 3, Article 7).   Hence, at the summit, there must be one cause, one source of all perfection, who alone can say, not merely “I have existence, truth, and life,” but rather “I am existence, truth, and life.”

Premise 1:  Things are more or less good, true, noble, etc.

Premise 2:  Things can only be more or less good, etc., in relation to a standard of the maximum.

Premise 3:  The maximum in any genus is the cause of everything else in the genus.

Conclusion:  There must be some maximum being which is the cause of all the good qualities in every other being = God.

Among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble and the like. But "more" and "less" are predicated of different things, according as they resemble in their different ways something which is the maximum, as a thing is said to be hotter according as it more nearly resembles that which is hottest; so that there is something which is truest, something best, something noblest and, consequently, something which is uttermost being; for those things that are greatest in truth are greatest in being, as it is written in Metaph. ii. Now the maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus; as fire, which is the maximum heat, is the cause of all hot things.

Therefore there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God.

Lastly, if we find in the world, inanimate and animated, natural activities manifestly proportioned to a purpose, this proportioned fitness presupposes an intelligence which produces and preserves this purposeful tendency. If the corporeal world tends to a cosmic center of cohesion, if plant and animal tend naturally to assimilation and reproduction, if the eye is here for vision and the ear for hearing, feet for walking and wings for flying; if human intelligence tends to truth and human will to good, and if each man by nature longs for happiness, then necessarily these natural tendencies, so manifestly ordained to a proportioned good, a proportioned purpose, presuppose a supreme ordinator, a supreme intelligence, which knows and controls the raison d'etre of all things and this supreme ordinator must be wisdom itself and truth itself. For again, union presupposes unity, presupposes absolute identity. A thing uncaused, says Saint Thomas, (Quod causam non habet primum et immediatum est. Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Contra Gentiles, Book  II, Chapter 15, ¶ 2)  is of itself, and immediately, i.e. without intermediary, being itself, one by nature, not by participation. (Ens per essentiam et non per participationem. Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Contra Gentiles, Book  II, Chapter 15, ¶ 2).

Premise 1:  Things without intelligence act, for the most part, for the best result.

Premise 2:  Sub-Conclusion:  Things are acting for an end.

Premise 3: An unintelligent thing cannot move toward an end unless directed by an intelligent being.

Conclusion: There is an intelligent being that directs all things toward their end = God.

We see that things which lack intelligence, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that not fortuitously, but designedly, do they achieve their end. Now whatever lacks intelligence cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is shot to its mark by the archer.

Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God.

We identify this outfit as the    Satanic XVatican 2 church.  WHY?

Synod Vatican 2

The CONVENTION of
Three Thousand Good-for-Nothings:
anti-Catholic Infiltrators, including:
Communists, Freemasons, and Modernist Heretics
X
Thier CONVENTION is called
Synod Vatican 2.

Synod Vatican 2 was characterized as:

“a sinister farce acted out by three thousand good-for-nothings, some of whom, despite the gold [pectoral] crosses on their chests, don’t even believe in the Trinity or the Virgin” (Bishop Antonio Romeo of the Sacred Congregation of Rites in Bob Considine’s column ON THE LINE in the NEW YORK JOURNAL AMERICAN of Friday, November 27, 1964).

Even the Popes since Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978], have taken the names of the two Popes immediately connected with Synod Vatican 2, i.e., John 23, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli [Tuesday, October 28, 1958 - Monday, June 3, 1963], and Paul 6 which, for the very first time in almost 2,000 years has resulted in a double-name, i.e., “John-Paul”:

John-Paul 1, Albano Luciani [Saturday, August 26, 1978 - Thursday, September 28, 1978.

John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005].

Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X

An infallible Pope has spoken against such things. He has written in part:

"From all that has preceded, it is abundantly clear how great and how eager is the passion of such men for innovation. In all Catholicism there is absolutely nothing on which it does not fasten. They wish philosophy to be reformed, especially in the ecclesiastical seminaries. They wish the Scholastic Philosophy to be relegated to the history of philosophy and to be classed among absolute systems, and the young men to be taught modern philosophy which alone is true and suited to the times in which we live. They desire the reform of theology: rational theology is to have modern philosophy for its foundation, and positive theology is to be founded on the history of dogma. As for history, it must be written and taught only according to their methods and modern principles. Dogmas and their evolution, they affirm, are to be harmonized with science and history."

"In the Catechism no dogmas are to be inserted except those that have been reformed and are within the capacity of the people. Regarding worship, they say, the number of external devotions is to he reduced, and steps must be taken to prevent their further increase, though, indeed, some of the admirers of symbolism are disposed to be more indulgent on this head."

"They cry out that ecclesiastical government requires to be reformed in all its branches, but especially in its disciplinary and dogmatic departments. They insist that both outwardly and inwardly it must be brought into harmony with the modern conscience which now wholly tends towards democracy; a share in ecclesiastical government should therefore be given to the lower ranks of the clergy and even to the laity and authority which is too much concentrated should be decentralized."

"The Roman Congregations and especially the index and the Holy Office, must be likewise modified The ecclesiastical authority must alter its line of conduct in the social and political world; while keeping outside political organizations it must adapt itself to them in order to penetrate them with its spirit."

"With regard to morals, they adopt the principle of the Americanists, that the active virtues are more important than the passive, and are to be more encouraged in practice. They ask that the clergy should return to their primitive humility and poverty, and that in their ideas and action they should admit the principles of Modernism...What is there left in the Church which is not to be reformed by them and according to their principles?"  (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE MODERNISTS, Sunday, September 8, 1907 A.D., # 38; emphasis added).

"First of all they lay down the general principle that in a living religion everything is subject to change, and must in fact be changed. In this way they pass to what is practically their principal doctrine, namely, evolution. To the laws of evolution everything is subject under penalty of death -- dogma [no "infallible" dogmas], Church, worship [note: this includes the Mass], the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself. The enunciation of this principle will not be a matter of surprise to anyone who bears in mind what the Modernists have had to say about each of these subjects. Having laid down this law of evolution, the Modernists themselves teach us how it operates."

"And first, with regard to faith. The primitive form of faith, they tell us, was rudimentary and common to all men alike, for it had its origin in human nature and human life. Vital evolution brought with it progress, not by the accretion of new and purely adventitious forms from without, but by an increasing perfusion of the religious sense into the conscience. The progress was of two kinds: negative, by the elimination of all extraneous elements, such, for example, as those derived from the family or nationality; and positive, by that intellectual and moral refining of man, by means of which the idea of the divine became fuller and clearer, while the religious sense became more acute. For the progress of faith the same causes are to be assigned as those which are adduced above to explain its origin. But to them must be added those extraordinary men whom we call prophets -- of whom Christ was the greatest -- both because in their lives and their words there was something mysterious which faith attributed to the divinity, and because it fell to their lot to have new and original experiences fully in harmony with the religious needs of their time."

"The progress of dogma is due chiefly to the fact that obstacles to the faith have to be surmounted, enemies have to be vanquished, and objections have to be refuted. Add to this a perpetual striving to penetrate ever more profoundly into those things which are contained in the mysteries of faith. Thus, putting aside other examples, it is found to have happened in the case of Christ: in Him that divine something which faith recognized in Him was slowly and gradually expanded in such a way that He was at last held to be God."

"The chief stimulus of the evolution of worship consists in the need of accommodation to the manners and customs of peoples, as well as the need of availing itself of the value which certain acts have acquired by usage. Finally, evolution in the Church itself is fed by the need of adapting itself to historical conditions and of harmonizing itself with existing forms of society. Such is their view with regard to each. And here, before proceeding further, We wish to draw attention to this whole theory of necessities or needs, for beyond all that we have seen, it is, as it were, the base and foundation of that famous method which they describe as historical."

"Although evolution is urged on by needs or necessities, yet, if controlled by these alone, it would easily overstep the boundaries of tradition, and thus, separated from its primitive vital principle, would make for ruin instead of progress. Hence, by those who study more closely the ideas of the Modernists, evolution is described as a resultant from the conflict of two forces, one of them tending towards progress, the other towards conservation."

"The conserving force exists in the Church and is found in Tradition; Tradition is represented by religious authority, and this both by right and in fact. By right, for it is in the very nature of authority to protect tradition: and in fact, since authority, raised as it is above the contingencies of life, feels hardly, or not at all, the spurs of progress."

"The progressive force, on the contrary, which responds to the inner needs, lies in the individual consciences and works in them -- especially in such of them as are in more close and intimate contact with life. Already we observe, Venerable Brethren, the introduction of that most pernicious doctrine which would make of the laity the factor of progress in the Church. Now it is by a species of covenant and compromise between these two forces of conservation and progress, that is to say between authority and individual consciences, that changes and advances take place. The individual consciences, or some of them, act on the collective conscience, which brings pressure to bear on the depositories of authority to make terms and to keep to them."

"With all this in mind, one understands how it is that the Modernists express astonishment when they are reprimanded or punished. What is imputed to them as a fault they regard as a sacred duty"(Pope St. Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE MODERNISTS, Sunday, September 8, 1907 A.D., # 26-27; emphasis added).

See how students in those seminaries who were influenced by such Modernist errors while they were studying for the Holy Priesthood, and who later went on to become Cardinals and Bishops, could have so easily remained silent when the evolutionary changes made in the name of Synod Vatican 2 were made to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Seven Sacraments and the infallible dogmas of the UNCHANGEABLE Catholic Faith?!

Nay, how many of these students for the Priesthood in 1907 A.D., after they became Priests, Bishops and Cardinals, actually became the leaders of the Heresy of Modernism and subtly prepared themselves and their fellow Clergy for Synod Vatican 2 with all of its radical changes?

This would explain in part why the Jewish Cardinal Bea, is quoted as saying:

"Similarly the last part of the mass needed overhauling, with some kind of common prayer replacing the unsuitable Leonine prayers for the conversion of Russia, which usually follow the mass and are said in the vernacular.*  (* The Holy See has recently [1960] permitted these prayers to be omitted, under certain circumstances. Whether they are omitted or not has come to be regarded as something of a test of the conservativeness of parishes and of their receptiveness to the liturgical movement, in the U.S.A. at least.)"  (From: Xavier Rynee, LETTERS FROM VATICAN CITY, p. 117.)

Giuseppe Cardinal Siri
Archbishop of Genoa

Is it any wonder, then, that one reads how:

"[Synod Vatican 2 was] the greatest disaster in recent ecclesiastical history" (Giuseppe Cardinal Siri [b. Sunday, May 20, 1906 in Genoa, Italy - d. Tuesday, May 2, 1989], Archbishop of Genoa, Italy; from PONTIFF, p. 369 - Gordon Thomas/Max Morgan Witts).

A Pope speaks on this subject:

"And here we have already some of the artifices employed by Modernists to exploit their wares. What efforts do they not make to win new recruits! They seize upon professorships in the seminaries and universities, and gradually make of them chairs of pestilence. In sermons from the pulpit they disseminate their doctrines, although possibly in utterances which are veiled. In congresses they express their teachings more openly. In their social gatherings they introduce them and commend them to others. Under their own names and under pseudonyms they publish numbers of books, newspapers, reviews, and sometimes one and the same writer adopts a variety of pseudonyms to trap the incautious reader into believing in a multitude of Modernist writers. In short, with feverish activity they leave nothing untried in act, speech, and writing. And with what result? We have to deplore the spectacle of many young men, once full of promise and capable of rendering great services to the Church, now ["Now" was in 1907! It was bad then-but think of what it has become in the present "now", 1997!] gone astray. It is also a subject of grief to Us that many others who, while they certainly do not go so far as the former, have yet been so infected by breathing a poisoned atmosphere, as to think, speak, and write with a degree of laxity which ill becomes a Catholic. They are to be found among the laity, and in the ranks of the Clergy, and they are not wanting even in the last place where one might expect to meet them, in religious communities" (Pope Saint Pius X, Pascendi Dominici Gregis, ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE MODERNISTS, Sunday, September 8, 1907, # 43).

Yet even today there still seems to be a constant reference to Synod Vatican 2, the Popes connected with Synod Vatican 2, the Popes who have succeeded those Popes, the various historical events which have happened since John 23 became Pope and the various documents which have been issued since John 23 became Pope all make it sound as though nothing existed prior to the time of John 23!

In other words, with all of the emphasis on the above time period, it would seem as if the church did NOT actually exist until John 23 became the Pope!

At first sight, this may seem absurd and ridiculous! The Vatican did not just pop out of the clear blue sky one day and suddenly appear on Vatican hill in the city of Rome, totally complete with all of its different buildings, furnishings, gardens, staff, members, etc.! And, 2nd Pope John 23 was not the first Pope!

Plus, the Vatican world-wide organization consisting of various buildings such as churches, chapels, shrines, schools, convents, monasteries, seminaries, dioceses, hospitals, etc., not to mention all of their respective members, did not just suddenly appear from nowhere, as if by magic, the day 2nd John 23 became Pope!

On the other hand, despite all of these things, there is more truth to this than may first appear! How can this be?

Pope Pius XII cites:

"the well-known and venerable maxim, Legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi" -- let the rule for prayer determine the rule of belief [45]" (Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, On the Sacred Liturgy, # 48, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

Or, as Archbishop Fulton Sheen supposedly said:

"If you don't behave as you believe, you will end by believing as you behave."

An earlier writer likewise refers to this axiom:

"Being fully aware of the necessary connection between faith and worship, between lex orandi, lex credendi [the law of praying is the law of believing], they [the 16th Century Protestants of England] corrupted the Liturgical Order in many ways to suit the errors of the reformers,under the pretext of restoring it to its primitive form. Thus, in the whole Ordinal, not only is there no clear mention of the sacrifice, of consecration, of the priesthood, and of the power of consecrating and offering sacrifice, but, as We have just stated, every trace of these things, which had been in such prayers of the Catholic Rite, as they had not entirely rejected, was deliberately removed and struck out" (Pope Leo XIII, Gioacchino Pecci [Wednesday, February 20, 1878 - Monday, July 20, 1903], Papal Bull Apostolicae Curae, Declaration of the Invalidity of Anglican Orders, # 23, Tuesday, September 15, 1896 A.D.).

Here are a few objective examples:

"(This "objection" is placed within quotation marks [editor's note: to avoid confusion, the "objection" has been put into italics instead] because it comprises the exact words a certain Archbishop wrote to me after I had called to his attention the mutilation: FOR ALL MEN, ETC. in the new consecration "form.") IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE HERE THAT THE FORM OF CONSECRATION USED IN THE MASS GOES BACK EVEN BEFORE THE GOSPELS TO THE PRIMITIVE LITURGY WHICH WAS USED IN THE CHURCH BEFORE THE GOSPELS AND BEFORE THE EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL WERE WRITTEN."

"This is an old artifice, the Anglican Schismatics having used exactly the same pretext. "They knew only too well," said Pope Leo XIII, "the infinite bond which unites faith with worship, `the law of belief with the law of prayer' (LEX CREDENDI, LEX ORANDI) and so, UNDER THE PRETEXT OF RESTORING IT TO ITS PRIMITIVE FORM, they corrupted the order of the liturgy in many ways, TO ADAPT IT TO THE ERRORS OF THE INNOVATORS." (Bull Apostolicae Curae, emphasis added)"

"189. Elaborating further in the Vindication of the Bull, the English Bishops said, It could not have been, as you seem to suggest, because the Reformers wished to go back to what was primitive, FOR THEY CUT OUT WITH AN UNSPARING HAND the most ancient as well as the most modern portions of the Catholic rite (Emphasis added)" (Patrick Henry Omlor, Questioning the Validty of the Masses Using the New, All-English Canon, Op. Cit.).

This author goes on to say, in part:

"What people already believe is automatically and necessarily mirrored in the very words of the prayers they recite. This truism is one part of the principle: "lex credendi: lex orandi," the law of belief is the law of prayer. This principle works reversely also; that is to say, people can be LED towards certain beliefs by means of the very prayers they are accustomed to saying. And that is why parents teach their small children The Hail Mary, for example, and The Apostles' Creed, even though these little ones do not yet fully understand everything they are praying. Now, whether or not these parents are familiar with the phrase, "lex credendi: lex orandi," they are nevertheless putting this principle into practice, for they are teaching their children to PRAY those things that they will ultimately come to BELIEVE."

"To see how the 16th-century Heretics-Schismatics employed the principle, "lex credendi: lex orandi" in order to "move the simple from the superstitious opinions of the Popish Mass," (Ridley), we need look no farther than the example furnished by their taking up a very good and "pious" word, SPIRITUAL, in order to use it for a most evil purpose. All the quotations which follow immediately below are taken from the writings of these 16th-century "Reformers." In every instance their use of the word "SPIRITUAL" denotes the DENIAL OF THE REAL PRESENCE of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament; body, blood, soul and divinity. This is because they are using the "good" word SPIRITUAL, and applying it to the SACRIFICE OF THE MASS and to THE EUCHARIST. (The reader is asked to bear with me through these examples which follow, for there is an important point to be made.)"

"(1) Wycliffe: "The Body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the Supper only after an heavenly and SPIRITUAL manner. And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is faith."

"(2) Ridley: "He left the same in mystery to the faithful in the Supper, to be received after a SPIRITUAL communication, and by grace."

"(3) Coverdale: "(W)e think not our Lord Jesus Christ to be so vile that He may be contained in corruptible elements. Again, lest the force of this most sacred mystery should be diminished, we must think that it is wrought by the secret and wonderful power of God, and that His Spirit is the bond of this partaking, which is for that cause called SPIRITUAL."

"(4) Cranmer: "Although Christ be not corporally in the bread and wine ... He is effectually present, and effectually worketh, not in the bread and wine, but in the godly receivers of them, to whom He giveth His own flesh SPIRITUALLY to feed upon."

"(5) Again Cranmer in replying to Gardiner: "Therefore ... we do not pray absolutely that the bread and wine may be made the body and blood of Christ, but that therewith in spirit and in truth we may be SPIRITUALLY nourished."

"(6) Latimer: "Then we be assured that we feed upon Him SPIRITUALLY."

"(7) The Liturgy, of King Edward VI: "For us He hath not only give His body to death and shed His blood, but also doth vouchsafe in a sacrament and mystery to give us His said body and blood SPIRITUALLY, to feed and drink upon." " ... (F)or then we SPIRITUALLY eat the flesh of Christ and drink His blood, then we dwell in Christ and Christ in us." "He hath left in these holy mysteries as a pledge of His love, and a continual remembrance of the same, His own blessed body and precious blood, for us SPIRITUALLY to feed upon, to our endless comfort and consolation."

"(8) Grindall: "This is the SPIRITUAL, the very true, the only eating of Christ's body."

"(9) Jewell: "Thus, SPIRITUALLY, and with the mouth of faith, we eat the body of Christ and drink his blood." (10) Beacon: "He is also eaten or received SPIRITUALLY when we believe in Christ."

"(11) "The Book of Common Prayer" (1549): "but also doth vouchsafe in a Sacrament and mystery to give us his said body and blood to feed upon them SPIRITUALLY." "Thou hast vouchsafed to feed us in these holy mysteries with the SPIRITUAL food of the most precious body and blood of thy Son." More examples could be given (there is no shortage of them), for indeed it is difficult to find ANY ONE of the 16th-century Heretics who FAILED to use the word "SPIRITUAL," when writing of the Sacrifice of the Mass and The Eucharist. But this very pious-sounding word, "SPIRITUAL" did not fool those who were true, ORTHODOX Catholics. Finally, the Fathers of the Council of Trent condemned for all times the heresy contained in this use of the word "SPIRITUAL": "If anyone says that Christ received in the Eucharist is received SPIRITUALLY only, ... let him be anathema." (Canon 8, Session XIII)"

"THE NEW, ENGLISH CANON OF THE MASS MISTRANSLATES THE PRAYER "QUAM OBLATIONEM" TO IMPLY A SPIRITUAL OFFERING. This prayer, which IMMEDIATELY PRECEDES THE CONSECRATION PRAYERS, should read: "Do thou, O God, deign to bless what we offer, and make it approved, effective, right, and wholly pleasing in every way ..." The bogus, HERETICAL "Canon" now reads instead: "Bless and approve our offering; make it TRULY SPIRITUAL and acceptable." Obviously this is not just a "pious" use of the word SPIRITUAL. For at no time did this particular word EVER appear in "the holy canon, which is so free from error that it contains nothing that does not in the highest degree savor of a certain holiness and piety." (Council of Trent, Ch. 4, Session 22) "Lex credendi: lex orandi." Here is "orandi": "BLESS AND APPROVE OUR OFFERING; MAKE IT TRULY SPIRITUAL." Can "CREDENDI" be far behind? Can it be very long before "the simple people are moved" away from the belief in THE REAL PRESENCE?"

"In the new, English "Canon" we find in two places (that is, prior to the consecrations of both the bread and the wine) the SEEMINGLY uncalled-for insertion of the words: AND PRAISE. The original Latin reads simply, "gratias agens," GIVING THANKS. Why does the new, English "Canon" say, "he gave you thanks AND PRAISE"? It is true that the Mass is a sacrifice of PRAISE, petition, THANKSGIVING, and atonement; but, obviously, that is beside the point here. The simple words, GIVING THANKS, are quite proper and appropriate in this place, for they have their basis in Holy Writ. Four different accounts - to wit, Matt. (26,27); Mark (14,23); Luke (22,19) and I Cor. (11,24) - all have either "He gave thanks" or else "giving thanks." There is a special MEANINGFULNESS in these words, inasmuch as "giving thanks" is in Greek: EUCHARIST. Hence these very words, when recited by the priest just before the two consecrations, remind us of the Sacrament of the EUCHARIST. There is NO Scriptural account that makes mention that Our Lord on the occasion of instituting the Holy Eucharist gave thanks AND PRAISE. So, what is the explanation for this CHANGE made in the Canon of the Mass? Could it be another implementation of "lex CREDENDI: lex ORANDI"? As applied TO A SACRIFICE, this particular phraseology - that is, the words "praise" and "thanksgiving," taken together - did, in fact, convey a SINGULAR AND ESPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE to the 16th-century Heretics-Schismatics. According to the scholarly Canon Estcourt, "Luther led the attack. He DENIED THE CATHOLIC DOCTRINE of the Sacrifice of the Mass in ANY OTHER SENSE than as the sacrifice of PRAISE AND THANKSGIVING." (E. E. Estcourt, The Question of Anglican Ordinations Discussed, p. 281, emphasis added) But let us hear it from the Hieresiarchs themselves. First of all, Luther: "The Mass may be called a sacrifice, IF IT BE UNDERSTOOD as a sacrifice of PRAISE AND THANKSGIVING, not of a work, nor propitiatory." (De Usu Sacram, Euch. salutari, emphasis added) And by Cranmer, Luther's English counterpart, we are informed: "When the old fathers called the mass or supper of the Lord a sacrifice, they meant that it was a sacrifice of LAUDS (i.e., "praise") and THANKSGIVING ... BUT THEY MEANT IN NO WISE THAT IT IS A VERY TRUE SACRIFICE FOR SIN." (Cranmer, On the Lord's Supper, emphasis added) Thus to the Schismatics the Mass was a sacrifice of "PRAISE AND THANKSGIVING" which, in their argot, meant a BARE COMMEMORATION of the Sacrifice of Calvary, or a SPIRITUAL AND SYMBOLIC sacrifice. But NOT A REAL SACRIFICE, nor a sacrifice of PROPITIATION. This point Cranmer made quite clear, "And yet have I denied that it is a sacrifice propitiatory for sin." So well-known and infamous was the connotation the Schismatics had attached to the words "praise and thanksgiving" WHEN APPLIED TO THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS, the Fathers of the Council of Trent ONCE AND FOR ALL TIMES pronounced this solemn curse on this heresy: "If anyone says that the Sacrifice of the Mass is one only of PRAISE AND THANKSGIVING ... let him be anathema." (Canon 3, Session XXII) "Lex credendi: lex orandi." Here is "orandi": He gave you thanks AND PRAISE."

"At the peak of his rebellion, Martin Luther penned the hymn, Ein' feste Burg ist unser Gott. It was "the production," says the historian Ranke, "of the moment in which Luther, engaged in a conflict with a world of foes, sought strength in the consciousness that he was defending a divine (sic) cause which could never perish."

"Ein' feste Burg ist unser Gott" was called by Heine "The Marseillaise of the Reformation."

This battle-hymn of rebellion AGAINST THE CATHOLIC CHURCH is now appearing on "hymn cards" IN CATHOLIC CHURCHES. (St. Thomas Aquinas Church in Palo Alto, California, for example.) And as CATHOLICS sing this hymn, "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God" do they yet realize that they are echoing the great hieresiarch in his apostasy, his rebellion AGAINST THE ONE, TRUE, HOLY, CATHOLIC, APOSTOLIC ROMAN CHURCH which was founded by the SON OF GOD? "Lex credendi: lex orandi." Here is "orandi": THE MARSEILLAISE OF THE REFORMATION."

"EXAMPLE 4: "And I will go in to the table of God."
(New American version of Psalm 42, v. 4)"

"The destruction of the altars was a measure SO DISTINCT IN ITS MEANING that we have NEVER BEEN ABLE TO CONCEIVE HOW THAT MEANING COULD BE MISUNDERSTOOD. The measure meant a bitter hatred of the Mass, and a hatred DIRECTED AGAINST THE MASS ITSELF, not merely against some obscure abuse ... Surely if these reformers HAD DESIRED ONLY TO REMOVE AN ABUSE, but were full of reverence for the great Christian Sacrifice itself, they would not have destroyed and desecrated the altars, AND SUBSTITUTED TABLES IN THEIR PLACE, alleging as their reason, in unqualified terms, that `the form of a table shall more move the simple from the superstitious opinions of the Popish Mass unto the right use of the Lord's Supper. For THE USE OF AN ALTAR IS TO MAKE SACRIFICE ON IT; THE USE OF A TABLE IS TO SERVE MEN TO EAT UPON IT.' (Ridley's Works)." (Emphasis added) The foregoing were the words of the Roman Catholic Bishops of England in 1898. (Source: A Vindication of the Bull `Apostolicae Curae', par. 38, titled "The Destruction of Altars")" (Patrick Henry Omlor, Questioning the Validty of the Masses Using the New, All-English Canon, Op. Cit.).

Therefore, based upon the basic, objective principles of Catholic traditional teaching in the areas of theology, church history, liturgy, and church law as explained herein, as well as various dogmatic teachings, the  SatanicxVatican 2 church    can not consider itself, nor call itself, the "Catholic" Church, nor can any of its members in TRUTH call themselves "Catholic", be they Clergy, Religious or Laity! On the basis of LEX ORANDI, LEX CREDENDI they are all PROTESTANTS, whether they know it or not!!!

Various teachings, doctrines, dogmas, and most especially the liturgy of the Mass and Seven Sacraments which the Vatican 2 church teaches and/or uses are NOT CATHOLIC! Becaue of lex orandi, lex credendi, this ex-Catholic church, which has fallen into heresy, apostasy and schism from the Catholic Church, can only be called what it believes and prays, i.e., those NON-CATHOLIC beliefs and prayers of the  SatanicxVatican 2 church.

Photograph taken on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. and printed in the Pope's official newspaper, L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 18 (109) - Thursday, APRIL 30, 1970 A.D., page # 3.

Please note: the sequence of the names of the Cardinals given in the next paragraph seems to match the sequence of the Cardinals posing in this photograph.

"Among the many members of the Hierarchy present at the audience were Cardinals: Lercaro, Gracias. Giobbe, Confalonieri, Rugambwa, Felici, Gray, Enrique y Tarancon, and Willebrands"(Article: COMMISSION HOLDS FINAL MEETING, Pope commends work of "Consilium", L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., page # 1).

"In October 1967, the Episcopal Synod called in Rome was requested to pass a judgment on the experimental celebration of a so-called normative Mass, devised by the Consilium[with its very active 6 Protestant member/experts] for implementing the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. This Mass aroused the most serious misgivings. The voting showed considerable opposition (43 non placet), very many substantial reservations (62 juxta modum), and 4 abstentions out of 187 voters. The international press spoke of a refusal of the proposed normative Mass on the part of the Synod. Progressively- inclined papers made no mention of this.

Why? Since

"the voting [in October 1967] showed considerable opposition (43 non placet), and very many substantial reservations (62 juxta modum),"

It seems that Paul 6 understood the problem the Bishops were having. But instead of addressing the concerns of the Bishops, the Pope merely bypassed them! This is why it is so ironic that even Pope Paul 6 admitted this principle of lex orandi, lex credendi in his Speech on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. to the members of the Consilium!

On this point the Pope said:

"...theology should have more influence on the liturgical texts, so that therefore the "lex orandi" might correspond more aptly with the "lex credendi"..." (Article: COMMISSION HOLDS FINAL MEETING, Pope commends work of "Consilium", L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., page # 2).

John Carmel Cardinal Heenan

Therefore, Pope Paul 6, regarding whom it was said that the Novus Ordo Rite of Mass was written under the Holy Father's [Paul 6's] PERSONAL SUPERVISION (Cardinal Heenan, FORWARD to the English translation of the Novus Ordo in November, 1969 A.D.), knew all about lex orandi, lex credendi.

Pope Paul 6 also knew full well that SIX Protestants were actively working on the Consilium! Therefore, when he had his photograph-which is shown below-taken with these SIX Protestants he was NOT surprised to suddenly learn that there were Protestant who had been actively working on the Consilium, busily making up the newly updated, synthesized Protestant supper/meal, a.k.a. "mass".

These SIX Protestants were apparently experts on Protestant supper/meal liturgies since Pope Paul 6 said in his Speech on Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D.:

"Looking at the work accomplished by you in these years, We are impelled to offer you a full measure of thanks for so great and so many labours. For you were prompt and diligent, as well as expert, in dealing with a matter that was complicated and very difficult--and without expecting any reward, but seeking only to be of service to the Church" (Article: COMMISSION HOLDS FINAL MEETING, Pope commends work of "Consilium", L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., page # 1).

"On Friday, April 10, [1970] the Holy Father received in audience the Cardinals, Bishops and Experts [i.e., these 6 Protestants]... of the Consilium ad exsequendam Constitutionem de sacra Liturgia. The work of this Consilium had heen done in conjunction with the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship, under the presidency of Card. [Cardinal] Benno Gut(Article: COMMISSION HOLDS FINAL MEETING, Pope commends work of "Consilium", L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., page # 1).

In his Speech of Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D., did Pope Paul 6, as the official guardian of the Catholic Faith condemn the members of this Consilium for making up an updated, synthesized Protestant liturgy?
 

Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani [b. at Rome, Italy on Wednesday, October 29, 1890 - d. at Rome, Italy on Friday, August 3, 1979]

Antonio Cardinal Bacci [b. at Giugnola, near Florence, Italy on Friday, September 4, 1885 A.D.  - d. at Vatican City, Rome, Italy, on Wednesday, January 20, 1971 A.D.]

On the contrary, Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani and Antonio Cardinal Bacci had to do the Pope's job for him because the Pope certainly did NOT do his job!

Consider their Letter to him in which these two Roman Catholic Cardinals stated that:

"The Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The canons of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery" (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani and Antonio Cardinal Bacci, Letter to Pope Paul 6, Thursday, September 25, 1969 A.D.).

"the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The canons of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery"

Not only did Pope Paul 6 stubbornly IGNORE the Letter and its contents, plus its attached Study, which the two Cardinals had sent to him over six months before then, he REFUSED to admit the truth of the Catholic Church that the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the CATHOLIC theology of the Mass, instead, in his giddy euphoria, Paul 6 proclaimed:

"Venerable Brothers and dear [Protestant] sons, We are glad to give you a heartfelt greeting, and to speak to you... Looking at the work accomplished by you in these years, We are impelled to offer you a full measure of thanks for so great and so many labours. For you were prompt and diligent, as well as expert, in dealing with a matter that was complicated and very difficult... This work of yours was indeed arduous; documents had to be drawn up by which that Constitution of the Council [Vatican 2] would be gradually put into effect, the liturgical texts themselves had to be prepared, tried out by long use, then presented in a new way, or else totally new formulations drawn up... let Us note the many Instructions and other documents edited, and books of a subsidiary nature written by some of your members [did this include the six Protestant members?]; the new [Novus]Ordo Missae; the variations introduced... Since this Consilium of yours comes to its end, after its EXCELLENT activity
 
[no mention here of its activity which deviated dramatically from the INFALLIBLE Catholic dogmatic teachings on the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent!]


...with a specially warm love, we impart to each and all of you [including you six Protestants who have made up a liturgy which totally ignores the work of the Council of Trent which canons of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy - including the Protestant heresy which denies that the Mass is a Sacrifice and the denial of the Catholic dogma of Transubstantiation - directed against the integrity of the Mystery!] the Apostolic Blessing [in other words, I, the infallible Pope, Pope Paul 6, do hereby infallibly totally repudiate the infallible teachings of the Council of Trent which were promulgated by the infallible Pope, Pope Pius IV!]" (Article: COMMISSION HOLDS FINAL MEETING, Pope commends work of "Consilium", L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) - Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., pages # 1 - # 2).

Truth cannot be Truth's contrary (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Summa Contra Gentiles, IV,8) and moreover, since one truth cannot contradict another truth, every assertion contrary to the truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false (Fifth Lateran Council, [1512 A.D. - 1517 A.D.], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513 A.D.), at the very most, only one of these two "infallible popes" is teaching error and one is teaching the truth.

How so?

Historically, because of such anti-Catholic supper meals, the Roman Catholic Doctrinal Council of Trent automatically excommunicated ANYONE who would teach against or change the Catholic Rite of Mass in the future! Ten years AFTER the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI of 1562 A.D. by Protestant Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, the Roman Catholic Council of Trent replied to the Protestant heresies concerning the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which they considered to be a mere memorial meal.

Among other things, the Roman Catholic Council of Trent DOGMATICALLY Decreed:

"CANON I.--If any one saith, that in the Mass a true and proper sacrifice is not offered to God; or, that to be offered is nothing else but that Christ is given us to eat; let him be anathema."

"CANON III.--If any one saith, that the Sacrifice of the Mass is only a sacrifice of praise and of thanksgiving; or, that it is a bare commemoration of the Sacrifice consummated on the cross, but not a propitiatory Sacrifice; or, that it profits him only who receives; and that it ought not to be offered for the living and the dead for sins, pains, satisfactions, and other necessities; let him be anathema."

"CANON IV.--If any one saith, that, by the Sacrifice of the Mass, a blasphemy is cast upon the most holy sacrifice of Christ consummated on the cross; or, that it is thereby derogated from; let him be anathema."

"CANON VI.--If any one saith, that the Canon of the Mass contains errors, and is therefore to be abrogated [abolished]; let him be anathema."

"CANON VII.--If any one saith, that the ceremonies, vestments, and outward signs, which the Catholic Church makes use of in the celebration of masses, are incentives to impiety, rather than offices of piety; let him be anathema."

"CANON VIII.--If any one saith, that masses, wherein the priest alone communicates sacramentally, are unlawful, and are, therefore, to be abrogated [abolished]; let him be anathema. "

"CANON IX.--If any one saith, that the rite of the Roman Church, according to which a part of the canon and the words of consecration are pronounced in a low tone, is to be condemned; or, that the mass ought to be celebrated in the vulgar tongue only; or, that water ought not to be mixed with the wine that is to be offered in the chalice, for that it is contrary to the institution of Christ; let him be anathema" (Roman Catholic Council of Trent, Canons & Decrees, Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D.).

"ANATHEMA then appears as the more solemn form of pronouncing or declaring excommunication" (Rev. P. Chas. Augustine, O.S.B., D.D., A Commentary on the New Code of Canon Law, Vol. 8, Canons 2255 & 2256, p. 170).

"ANATHEMA: A thing or person struck by God's malediction and intended for ruin. Cf. I Cor. 12:13; Rom. 9:3; Gal. l:8-9. Anathema, in actual Church discipline, is the term used for IPSO FACTO excommunication incurred by those denying a solemnly defined truth, as is concluded principally from the dogmatic canons of the Council of Trent and the Vatican Council, (i.e. Vatican 1)" (Parente, Piolanti, Garofalo, Dictionary of Dogmatic Theology, Anathema).

Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius V

"All other churches aforesaid are hereby denied the use of other missals, which are to be wholly and entirely rejected; and by this present Constitution, which shall have the force of law in perpetuity, We order and enjoin under pain of Our displeasure that nothing be added to Our newly published Missal, nothing omitted therefrom, and nothing whatsoever altered therein...We order them...not to presume in celebrating Mass to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal..."

"Furthermore, by these presents and by virtue of Our Apostolic authority We give and grant in perpetuity that for the singing or reading of Mass in any church whatsoever, this Missal must be followed absolutely, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty, judgment or censure, and may be freely and lawfully used..."

"We likewise order and declare that no one whosoever shall be forced or coerced into altering this Missal and that this present Constitution can never be revoked or modified, but shall forever remain valid and have the force of law..."

"Accordingly, no one whosoever is permitted to infringe or rashly contravene this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, direction, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree and prohibition."

"Should any person venture to do so, let him understand that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul..." (Pope Saint Pius V, Papal Bull Quo Primum Tempore, Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.).

The violation of the above Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent and the Papal Bull Quo Primum Tempore, are all self-evident because the years since Synod Vatican 2 prove that these violations have taken place and continue to take place EVERY TIME the Novus Ordo Missae, the so-called "New Mass" is used!

It has been said that a picture is worth a thousand words. Here is the photographic evidence of the Protestant influence and active authorship of the Novus Ordo Rite Mass:

1) Dr. George;
2) Canon Jasper;
3) Dr. Shephard;
4) Dr. Konneth;
5) Dr. Smith; and,
6) Brother Max Thurian (in white), who is standing next to Pope Paul 6 (in white).

The World Council of Churches;
The Church of England;
The Lutheran Church;
The Protestant Community of Taize.

This photo proves in part why the New Mass is a synthesized, modernized, updated, 16th Century PROTESTANT Liturgical MEMORIAL, SUPPER MEMORIAL MEAL which contains only the mere shadow of the ancient CATHOLIC Rite of Mass because, by their own beliefs, Protestants do NOT believe in the CATHOLIC DOGMA of Transubstantiation!

Consider but one example-the Protestant denial of the Mystery of the Transubstantiation-found in the "Black Rubric" which explains why no one should kneel to receive Communion!

This is EXACTLY what has been going on in the    Satanic X Vatican 2 church    for some time!!!

Here is the actual wording of the Black Rubric:

"For as concerning the sacramental bread and wine, they remain still in their very natural substances and therefore may not be adored, for that were idolatry to be abhorred of all faithful christians. And as concerning the natural body and blood of our saviour christ, they are in heaven and not here" (Protestant Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, Second Prayer Book of Edward VI, Black Rubric, 1552 A.D.)

In reality, the clergy of the SatanicXVatican 2 church  are doing everyone a favor! What is this "favor"? The   SatanicXVatican 2 church  clergy are preventing their people from committing the Mortal Sin of idolatry by preventing them from kneeling before a piece of mere bread and a chalice of mere wine, neither of which are Transubstantiated during the supper/meal some Catholics mistakenly think is a "mass"!

We have been given to understand that in the July, 2002 Newsletter of the United States Bishops’  Committee on the Liturgy, standing to get the “host” (not on your tongue, but in your hand), is now a requirement!

This official Newsletter of the United States Bishops’  Committee on the Liturgy states in part:

“The bishops of the United States have decided that the normative posture for receiving Holy Communion should be standing.  Kneeling is NOT a licit [lawful] posture for receiving Holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States of America unless the bishop of a particular diocese has derogated from this norm in an individual and extraordinary circumstance.”

Will you also be arrested by the police and thrown into jail if you also insist on having the host put on your tongue???!!!!

WHAT are YOUR Bishops NOT telling YOU?  WHY do the Bishops NOT want you to KNEEL to get the host dropped in your hand?

Perhaps the Bishops have a conscience after all?

Apparently some of the Bishops finally woke up from there long snooze and realized that everyone who was getting a host in a kneeling position was committing the mortal sin of idolatry!  Why?

Because the “host”, whether it happens to be a donut, cornbread, coffee cake, pizza, or any other weird thing, is only a donut, cornbread, coffee cake, pizza, or any other weird thing, or even the “traditional” host of unleavened bread, and nothing more!  In other words, it is NOT Jesus Christ really and truly physically present by transubstantiation under the species of bread (donuts, cornbread, coffee cakes, pizza, or any other weird things) and wine as it still is in the “Old Mass” of pre-Synod Vatican 2 days!

This is because this official Newsletter of the United States Bishops’  Committee on the Liturgy of July, 2002, by praxis, has officially adopted the “Black Rubric” of the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI of 1552 A.D. made up by the first Protestant Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer [b. Nottinghamshire, England in 1489 A.D. - d. burnt at the stake in Oxford, England in 1556 A.D.].

Bishop Tom, while not explicitly forbidding people from kneeling to get the host, nevertheless set the precedent that it was better NOT to kneel because it is idolatry to kneel before a piece of bread because the position of kneeling visibly and physically manifests an external act of adoration, here the adoration of the host which does NOT contain Jesus Christ, which act of kneeling, being worship, then becomes the Mortal Sin of idolatry!

Brother Max Thurian (in white), who is standing next to Pope Paul 6 (in white), has allegedly said:

"This Novus Ordo Missae [i.e., the "new mass"] is so profoundly Ecumenical thatxit is THEOLOGICALLY possible for Protestants to celebrate the Lord's Supper in the SAME WORDS.  [He should know because he helped to piece it together!] The new simplified Offertory does NOT anticipate a sacrificial act [as it does in the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass] and therefore does away with the difficulty which the "old" Offertory [of the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass] presented to Ecumenical efforts."

We were personally told by an Episcopalian Priest that various Priest-friends of his, who are members of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church, take turns concelebrating together, at the same table, this new supper meal liturgy in their respective churches. This was back in 1971!!!

Put in other words, what this Protestant Priest told Us was that he concelebrates the Novus Ordo, "new mass", with Priests from the SatanicXVatican 2 church  whom he invites to his church. These priests come into his church, and, together, they concelebrate this new supper memorial meal liturgy some people mistakenly think is still a "mass", and this Protestant Priest, in turn, gets invited over to the various   SatanicXVatican 2 church  of his concelebration buddies, to use the same exact new supper memorial meal liturgy ignorant people still call a "mass"! They even use the same brand new three year cycle-at least it was new at that time!

The reason that he and other PROTESTANT priests can use the same exact new supper meal liturgy, which is used in the  SatanicXVatican 2 church, is because, as Brother Max Thurian, one of its photographed authors of this updated 16th Century PROTESTANT supper memorial meal, says, that the new simplified Offertory does NOT anticipate a sacrificial act! Therefore, there is no danger of accidentally transubstantiating! In other words, there is no danger of accidentally turning this modernized 16th Century PROTESTANT supper memorial meal into a CATHOLIC Mass!

But how do other Protestants view the Novus Ordo Rite of Mass, the "new mass", supper memorial meal used in the  SatanicXVatican 2 church?

Here is one example:

"...nothing in the renewed [i.e., in the supper memorial meal or Novus Ordo - "new "mass" used in the  SatanicXVatican 2 church] Mass need really trouble the Evangelical Protestant." (M.G. Siegvalt, Protestant Professor of Dogmatic Theology, Strasbourg).

OFFICIAL DEFINITION OF THE NOVUS ORDO RITE

Over the years, may people have wanted to vehemently argue with Us claiming that the New Mass is valid, that it is a Sacrifice, and that those who say it is only a Protestant supper memorial meal are expressing a personal opinion because their church still has the "Mass"!

Such people simply do not know the truth and are victims of wishful thinking!  Not one person, over the years, has not only never read the OFFICIAL DEFINITION of the New Mass, the Novus Ordo Rite, they do not even know that such a thing exists!!!!  Therefore, so that the Truth may set everyone free, it is necessary for you to learn not only that such a thing DOES exist, but also what it actually says.

In other words, WHAT IS THE OFFICIAL DEFINITION of the Novus Ordo Missae - "New Mass" used in the SatanicXVatican 2 church?!  It should be self-evident that this OFFICIAL DEFINITION is the ONLY definition which matters, because it is what the Priests, Bishops, Cardinals and Popes of the SatanicXVatican 2 church  are expected to teach their de facto Protestant Laity!

"The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God, with a priest presiding, to celebrate the memorial of the lord. [12]" (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy-Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, Sunday, April 6, 1969 A.D., Benno Card. Gut, Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, # 7.)

"12. PRESBYTERORUM ORDINIS, no. 5; CSL, no. 33." (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, ICEL-International Committee on English in the Liturgy- Sacred Congregation of Rites Decree, April 6, 1969, Benno Card. Gut, Prefect of the S.R.C., President of the Consilium, Chapter II, Footnotes; Footnote # 12.)

"...through the ministry of the Bishop, God consecrates priests so that they can share by a special title in the priesthood of Christ. Thus, in performing sacred functions they can act as the ministers of Him who in the liturgy continually exercises His priestly office on our behalf by the action of His Spirit...And especially by the celebration of Mass, men offer sacramentally the sacrifice of Christ." (PRESBYTERORUM ORDINIS, # 5.)

"Although the sacred liturgy is above all things the worship of the divine Majesty, it likewise contains much instruction for the faithful. For in the liturgy God speaks to His people and Christ is still proclaiming His gospel. And the people reply to God both by song and prayer."

"Moreover, the prayers addressed to God by the priest who presides over the assembly in the person of Christ are said in the name of the entire holy people and of all present. And the visible signs used by the liturgy to signify invisible divine things have been chosen by Christ or the Church. Thus not only when things are read `which were written for our instruction' (Rom. 15:4), but also when the Church prays or sings or acts, the faith of those taking part is nourished and their minds are raised to God, so that they may offer Him their rational service and more abundantly receive His grace." (Constitution on the Liturgy, # 33.)

"The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God..." (GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, Chapter II, # 7) is NOT the same thing as "...by the celebration of Mass, men offer sacramentally..." (PRESBYTERORUM ORDINIS, # 5).

"The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God..." (GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, CHAPTER II, # 7) is NOT the same as "...Although the sacred liturgy is above all things the worship of the divine Majesty..." (Constitution on the Liturgy, # 33).

"....the assembly or gathering together of the people of God..." (GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, CHAPTER II, # 7) is NOT the same as "...the prayers addressed to God by the priest who presides over the assembly..." (CONSTITUTION ON THE LITURGY, # 33).

Therefore, as you can see for yourself, there is to be found no CLEAR, OBJECTIVE, LOGICAL reason for saying that "The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the people of God, with a priest presiding, to celebrate the memorial of the lord. [12]" (THE GENERAL INSTRUCTION AND THE NEW ORDER OF MASS, Chapter II, # 7.) is based upon either PRESBYTERORUM ORDINIS, # 5 and/or the CONSTITUTION ON THE LITURGY, # 33.

The variances generated by a comparison of the various points of these documents are irreconcilable because not only are these variances illogical-that would be bad enough-but what is of the gravest concern is that these variances are irreconcilable with the Deposit of Faith as it has been preserved by the Catholic Church!

For example, "the memorial of the Lord" as used in the teachings of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church  is ambiguous and equivocal in the extreme! What EXACTLY does it mean? Think about it!

For example, "the memorial of the Lord"could mean: the Stations of the Cross or the 40 Hours Devotion, or Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, or a statue of Christ, or a picture of Christ, or a Crucifix, etc.; etc.!

But "that which signifies many things is an ambiguous sign and consequently occasions deception; this is clearly seen in equivocal words. But all deception should be removed from the Christian religion according to Col. 2:8: `Beware, lest any man cheat you by philosophy and vain deceit.'" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., SUMMA THEOLOGICA, Part III, Question 60, Article 3, Reply to Objection 1.)

Then, when one considers these ambiguous definitions within the context of Newspeak and praxis, one finds concelebrations with Protestant priests. In addition, historically, theologically, liturgically, dogmatically, one finds that the "new mass" is not "Catholic"!

For example, consider how, in The Ottaviani Intervention, mention is specifically made that:

"the Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The "canons" of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery" (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani, Antonio Cardinal Bacci, Letter to Pope Paul 6, Thursday, September 25, 1969 A.D.).

Roman Theologians on the Definition of the Novus Ordo Missae

"9. Let us begin with the definition of the Mass given in No. 7 of the "Institutio Generalis" at the beginning of the second chapter of the Novus Ordo Missae: "De structura Missae":

9.1 "The Lord's Supper is the assembly or gathering together of the People of God, with a priest presiding, to celebrate the memorial of the Lord. For this reason the promise of Christ is particularly true of the local congregation of the Church: 'Where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in their midst'"

"10. The definition of the Mass is thus limited to that of a "supper", and this term is found constantly repeated . This "supper" is further characterized as an assembly presided over by the priest and held as a memorial of the Lord, recalling what He did on the first Maundy Thursday. None of this in the very least implies either the Real Presence, or the reality of the sacrifice, or the Sacramental function of the consecrating priest, or the intrinsic value of the Eucharistic Sacrifice independently of the people's presence. It does not, in a word, imply any of the essential dogmatic values of the Mass which together provide its true definition. Here, the deliberate omission of these dogmatic values amounts to their having been superseded and therefore, at least in practice, to their denial."

"11. In the second part of this paragraph 7 it is asserted, aggravating the already serious equivocation, that there holds good, "eminenter," for this assembly Christ's promise that "Ubi sunt duo vel tres congregati in nomine meo; ibi sum in medio eorum". This promise, which refers only to the spiritual presence of Christ with His grace, is thus put on the same qualitative plane, save for the greater intensity, as the substantial and physical reality of the Sacramental Eucharistic Presence."

"12. In no.8 a subdivision of the Mass into "liturgy of the word" and Eucharistic liturgy immediately follows, with the affirmation that in the Mass is made ready "the table of God's word" as of "the Body of Christ", so that the faithful "may be built up and refreshed"--an altogether improper assimilation of the two parts of the liturgy, as though between two points of equal symbolic value. More will be said about this point later."

"13. The Mass is designated by a great many different expressions, all acceptable relatively, all unacceptable if employed, as they are, separately and in an absolute sense. We cite a few: the Action of Christ and of the People of God; the Lord's Supper or Mass; the Paschal Banquet; the Common participation in the Lord's Table; the memorial of the Lord; the Eucharistic Prayer; the Liturgy of the Word and the Eucharistic Liturgy; etc."

"14. As is only too evident, the emphasis is obsessively placed upon the supper and the memorial instead of upon the unbloody renewal of the Sacrifice of Calvary. The formula "the Memorial of the Passion and Resurrection of the Lord" is, besides, inexact, the Mass being the memorial of the Sacrifice alone, in itself redemptive, whilst the Resurrection is the consequent fruit of it."

"15. We shall later see how, in the same consecratory formula, and throughout the Novus Ordo, such equivocations are renewed and reiterated"(Roman Theologians, The Critical Study of the New Order of Mass, June 5, 1969, # 9 - 15).

On the contrary, Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Antonio-Michele Ghislieri [Friday, January 7, 1566 - Monday, May 1, 1572], forbade any substantial changes (In practice, only rubrical texts could be changed for purposes of clarifications and new feasts were excluded from the prohibition of changes.) at all in the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass at any time in the future:

"...By this Our Decree, to be valid IN PERPETUITY, We determine and order that NEVER shall anything be added to, omitted from, or changed in this Missal [i.e., in the MISSALE ROMANUM-the Missal which contains the Ancient Roman Rite of Mass]..." Quo Primum Tempore Tuesday, July 14, 1570 A.D.) In addition, the Pope added severe penalties for the failure of anyone to obey this Bull.

"CANON VI.--If any one saith, that the Canon of the Mass contains errors, and is therefore to be abrogated [abolished]; let him be anathema."

"CANON IX.--If any one saith, that the rite of the Roman Church, according to which a part of the canon and the words of consecration are pronounced in a low tone, is to be condemned...; let him be anathema. " (Roman Catholic Council of Trent, Canons and Decrees, Session 22, Monday, September 17, 1562 A.D.).

(Father Joseph Gelineau S.J.  This quotation is from his book - Demain La Liturgk, Paris, 1976, pp. 9-10; emphasis added).

One point that seems to have been ignored by the apologists for the use of the Novus Ordo Rite, NOR, the NEW mass, in the infamous  SatanicX Vatican 2 church, is the fact that the SACRAMENT of the Most Holy Eucharist is CONFECTED by the Double Consecration during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

But, when there is no SACRIFICE of the Mass, there is no SACRAMENT of the Mass because the Transubstantiation, which confects the Sacrament of the Most Holy Eucharist, is the efficient cause of the SACRIFICIAL ACT, and therefore the sine qua non, not only of part of the ontological essence of the Mass as a Sacrifice, but also part of the metaphysical essence of the Mass as a Sacrifice.  When there is no Transubstantiation, there is no Sacrifice and there is no Sacrament.

The bottom line is that the Liturgical Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is of DIVINE Institution by God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest.

There are those who are wont to emphasize that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is not only a SACRIFICE, but it is also a SACRAMENT, and hence ANY SACRAMENT can be changed at the whim of anyone!

On the contrary, this is simply NOT true!

For example:

"The Roman Pontiff, regarding the administration of the Sacraments of the Church, can tolerate and even permit different [Ancient Historical] Rites of the Church of Christ...  [but] always without violating those things which pertain to the integrity and necessary parts of the Sacraments." (Pope Clement VI, Pierre Roger De Beaufort [Monday, May 7, 1342 - Wednesday, December 6, 1352], SUPER QUIBUSDAM, Wednesday, September 29, 1351 A.D.).

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.,
With His Summa Theologica

"The power of a Sacrament is from God alone, as We have shown above (A. 1; 62, A 1). Therefore, God alone can institute a Sacrament" (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P. [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], SUMMA THEOLOGICA, Part III, Question 64, Article 2).

Roman Catholic Pope, Saint Pius X

"It is well known that to the Church there belongs no right whatsoever to innovate in anything touching on the substance [i.e., the ontological essence] of the Sacraments" (Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], EX QUO NON, Monday, December 26, 1910 A.D.).

Roman Catholic Pope, Pius XII

"...the Church has no power over the 'substance [essences] of the Sacraments'..." (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], SACRAMENTUM ORDINIS, Sunday, November 30, 1947 A.D.).

Roman Catholic Council of Trent

"...in the administration of the Sacraments, their substance [essence] being untouched (salva illorum substantia)..." (Roman Catholic Council of Trent, Session 21, Monday, July 16, 1562 A.D., Chapter 2).

Roman Catholic Pope, Innocent III

Returning now to the Mass as a SACRIFICE, historically, the theological truth which is known as Transubstantiation has been attacked by those who are ignorant of God's Holy Truths, but also defended by many, including this example of Papal Infallibility:

"You have asked [indeed] who has added to the form of the words which Christ Himself expressed when He changed the bread and wine into the Body and Blood, that in the Canon of the [Ancient Roman Rite of] Mass which the general [Western] Church uses, which none of the Evangelists is read to have expressed...

In the Canon of the [Ancient Roman Rite of] Mass that expression, MYSTERIUM FIDEI, is found interposed among His words...

Surely we find many such things omitted from the words as well as from the deeds of the Lord by the Evangelists, which the Apostles are read to have supplied by word or to have expressed by deed...

From the expression, moreover, concerning which your brotherhood raised the question, namely MYSTERIUM FIDEI, certain people have thought to draw a protection against error, saying that in the Sacrament of the Altar, the truth of the Body and Blood of Christ does not exist, but only the image and species and figure, inasmuch as Scripture sometimes mentions that what is received at the Altar is Sacrament and Mystery and Example.

But such run into a snare of error, by reason of the fact that they neither properly understand the authority of Scripture, nor do they reverently receive the Sacraments of God, equally ignorant of the Scriptures and the power of God (Matthew 22:29)...

Yet MYSTERIUM FIDEI is mentioned, since something is believed there other than what is perceived; and something is perceived other than is believed. For the species of bread and wine is perceived there, and the truth of the Body and Blood of Christ is believed and the power of unity and of love... (Pope Innocent III, Lotario Dei Conti Di Segni [Thursday, January 8, 1198 - Saturday, July 16, 1216], Letter, Cum Marthae Circa, to John, the Archbishop of Lyons, Friday, November 29, 1202 A.D.).

Now how about the clergy of the SatanicXVatican 2 church who seem to take advantage of the learned ignorance (a.k.a., propaganda) of their own people!

For example, consider these warnings issued under Papal Infallibility by a Roman Catholic Pope:

"62. Assuredly it is a wise and most laudable thing to return in spirit and affection to the sources of the sacred liturgy. For research in this field of study, by tracing it back to its origins, contributes valuable assistance towards a more thorough and careful investigation of the significance of feast-days, and of the meaning of the texts and sacred ceremonies employed on their occasion.

But it is neither wise nor laudable to reduce everything to antiquity by every possible device.

Thus, to cite some instances, one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive tableform; were he to want black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments; were he to forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches; were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings; and lastly were he to disdain and reject polyphonic music or singing in parts, even where it conforms to regulations issued by the Holy See"  (Roman Catholic Pope, Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, On the Sacred Liturgy, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

"Round about the cauldron go;
In the poison'd entrails throw.
Toad, that under cold stone
Days and nights has thirty-one
Swelter'd venom sleeping got,
Boil thou first i' the charmed pot.
ALL. Double, double, toil and trouble;
Fire burn and cauldron bubble."
(William Shakespeare, THE TRAGEDY OF MACBETH, 1606 A.D., ACT IV. SCENE I. A cavern. In the middle, a boiling cauldron. FIRST WITCH.
N.B.  Was this scene designed by Shakespeare as a subtle condemnation of the 16th Century Protestants who threw the Altars out of Churches?! )

Why? Because history has repeated itself:

"# 38. THE DESTRUCTION OF ALTARS. The destruction of the altars was a measure so distinct in its meaning that we have never been able to conceive how the meaning could be misunderstood. This measure meant a bitter hatred of the Mass and a hatred directed against the Mass itself, not merely against some obscure abuse...  Surely if these reformers had desired only to remove an abuse, but were full of reverence for the great Christian Sacrifice itself, they would not have destroyed and desecrated the altars and substituted tables in their place, alleging as their reason, in unqualified terms, that the form of a table shall more move the simple from the superstitious opinions of the Popish Mass unto the right use of the Lord's Supper. For the use of an altar is to make sacrifice upon it; the use of a table is to serve men to eat upon it"(The Catholic Bishops of England, Vindication of the Bull Apostolicae Curae, # 38, 1898 A.D.; emphasis added.).

the use of an ALTAR is to make sacrifice upon it; the use of a TABLE is to serve men to eat upon it.

Concerning this use of a supper table in place of the Altar of Sacrifice, the Pope INFALLIBLY declares that one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive tableform (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, On the Sacred Liturgy, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

IF the Pope is the Pope and IF the Pope is infallible, then no Pope in the future can ever teach or do anything contrary to any of his predecessors. The bottom line is that IF John-Paul 2 is the Pope and is infallible, then he, by the definition of primacy and infallibility, MUST teach EXACTLY the same things his predecessors taught, including Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII who taught that one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive tableform (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, On the Sacred Liturgy, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947).
 

Vatican 2 Pope John-Paul 2 X X X X X X X

But since SatanicXVatican 2 church  Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], and his church, uses the primitive tableform, this logically means: 1)  That either Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], was not a Pope and not infallible. 2)  Or that  SatanicXVatican 2 church Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], is not a Pope and is not infallible. Why? Because there is a clear contradiction here because, as Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches, "Truth cannot be Truth's contrary"  (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Summa Contra Gentiles, IV,8) and moreover, since one truth cannot contradict another truth, every assertion contrary to the truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false (Fifth Lateran Council, [1512-1517], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513 A.D.), one of these two popes is teaching error and one is teaching the truth.

Is it the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday,  March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958]?

Or, is it the SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]?

X X X X

To continue, remember what Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], taught under Roman Catholic Papal infallibility, saying in part:  "Thus, to cite some instances, one would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to its primitive tableform; were he to want black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments; were he to forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches; were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings; and lastly were he to disdain and reject polyphonic music or singing in parts, even where it conforms to regulations issued by the Holy See" (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, On the Sacred Liturgy, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

Today, it is an established historical Truth that the SatanicXVatican 2 church  has in fact had black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments. They replaced the black with white to signify an instant canonization of the newly dead!

Why? Because black vestments, according to CATHOLIC tradition, are used for Masses for the Dead, both on All Souls Day, November 2, each year, but also on the day of death or burial of a person and also on their anniversary, etc. The black was a reminder not only of death itself, but also of the doctrine of Purgatory and also of one's obligation and responsibility to have a Requiem Mass offered for one's loved ones who have died.

Here again one can see yet another Protestant heresy, this one on justification which errors were condemned by the Roman Catholic Council of Trent in the 16th Century!

Once more, you would do well to recall that infallible Papal teaching that one would be straying from the straight path... were he to want black excluded as a color for the liturgical vestments (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).
 

Photo of SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope,  Pope John-Paul 2 about to kiss a woman. Is it his Wife, Edwidge, or is it his Daughter?

But since SatanicXVatican 2 church  Pope John-Paul 2, John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], and his new SatanicXVatican 2 church  use white and have excluded black as a color for the liturgical vestments, this logically means that either Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], was not a Pope and not infallible, or that  SatanicXVatican 2 church  Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005] is not a Pope and is not infallible because there is a clear contradiction here. Why, because, as Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches, "Truth cannot be Truth's contrary" (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Summa Contra Gentiles, IV, 8) and moreover, since one truth cannot contradict another truth, every assertion contrary to the truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false (Fifth Lateran Council, [1512 A.D. - 1517 A.D.], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513 A.D.), one of these two popes is teaching error and one is teaching the truth.

Is it the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday,  March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958]?

Or, is it the SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]?

Again, citing a Roman Catholic Papal infallible teaching, one would be straying from the straight path were he to... forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches.   (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

Here is but one example of Newspeak and praxis at work!

In fact, it seems that very few SatanicXVatican 2 church  have any statues left in them.

We recall many years ago the true story of a  SatanicXVatican 2 church "priest" who had all of the statues in his church buried in the ground on the farm of one of his parishioners!

Shortly thereafter, the SatanicXVatican 2 church "bishop" of that diocese had that church building bulldozed to the ground!  Why?  Apparently, he was afraid We were going to purchase that church building!  That church building had nothing wrong with it because it was a solid brick structure with a new roof on it and the continual maintenance on it kept it in very good condition!

Historically, the Protestants threw out most, if not all, of the statues in what once had been Catholic Churches when they took over in England, Germany and other countries!

But, according to Papal Infallibility, one would be straying from the straight path were he to forbid the use of sacred images and statues in Churches (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).
 

SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope John-Paul 2 X X

But since  SatanicXVatican 2 church  Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005] and his   SatanicXVatican 2 church  have, by Newspeak and praxis, thrown out most of the sacred images and statues in their churches, this logically means that either Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958],  was not a Pope and not infallible, or that  SatanicXVatican 2 church Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]  is not a Pope and is not infallible because there is a clear contradiction here because, as Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches, "Truth cannot be Truth's contrary"  (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Summa Contra Gentiles, IV, 8) and moreover, since one Truth cannot contradict another Truth, every assertion contrary to the Truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false (Fifth Lateran Council, [1512-1517], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513 A.D.), one of these two popes is teaching error and one is teaching the truth.

Is it the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday,  March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958]?

Or, is it the SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]?

On another point, Roman Catholic Papal Infallibility speaks again: "One would be straying from the straight path were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings." (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947 A.D.).

The answer is YES because all you need to do is go into almost any  SatanicXVatican 2 church, with but a few exceptions, and you will see what is called the "risen Christ" which now takes the place not only of the divine Redeemer's body which no longer shows any trace of His cruel sufferings, but in many cases totally replaces the Crucifix itself!

This excessive focus on the glorified state of the risen Christ glosses over the horrible pain, agony, sufferings and death of Christ on the Cross. When looking at a Crucifix, one can receive almost immediate consolation from their trials in this life because Christ's cross was bigger and heavier and more painful than ours. But there is no way to personally identify with this "risen Christ" because none of us in this life have yet to attain to it, whereas, in contradistinction, most people can relate in some way to the sufferings of Christ shown on the Crucifix.

Yet Roman Catholic Papal Infallibility teaches that one would be straying from the straight path were he to order the crucifix so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings (Roman Catholic Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], Encyclical Mediator Dei, # 62, Thursday, November 20, 1947).
 

X X X X X X X X X X X X

But since the Pope of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], and his Vatican 2 churchhave, by Newspeak and praxis, replaced the crucifixes with the "risen Christ" which is so designed that the divine Redeemer's body shows no trace of His cruel sufferings, this logically means that either the Roman Catholic Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday, March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958], was not a Pope and not infallible, or that the SatanicXVatican 2 church  Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005], is not a Pope and is not infallible. Why? Because there is a clear contradiction here because, as Saint Thomas Aquinas teaches, "Truth cannot be Truth's contrary" (Saint Thomas Aquinas [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. 1274 A.D. in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Summa Contra Gentiles, IV, 8) and moreover, since one truth cannot contradict another truth, every assertion contrary to the truth of Faith, We define to be altogether false (Fifth Lateran Council, [1512 A.D. - 1517 A.D.], Session 1, Friday, December 19, 1513 A.D.), only one of these two popes is teaching error and only one is teaching the truth!

Is it the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday,  March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958]?

Or, is it the SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]?

Finally, what has been applied above to the Altar of Sacrifice, black liturgical vestments, sacred images and statues, and the crucifix, can also be applied, at least it seems in many places, to the issue of music as well.

Is it the Roman Catholic Church Pope, Pope Pius XII, Eugenio Pacelli [Thursday,  March 2, 1939 - Thursday, October 9, 1958]?

Or, is it the SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope, Pope John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]?

SatanicX Vatican 2 church Pope,  Pope Paul 6 X X X X X

For those of you who are sincere Catholics and who would say that you must trust and obey the "pope", just remember this next photograph, the large one found below, of the second "pope" of the   SatanicXVatican 2 church  and one of the two co-founding "popes" of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church, Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978].   In the below photo, YOU will see the second "pope" of the SatanicXVatican 2 church, an "infallible pope"?, congratulating the six Protestant members of the Consilium which made up an updated, synthesized Protestant liturgical supper-memorial-meal which is frequently called, by victimized, sincere Catholics, the "new mass", or Novus Ordo Missae, and yet, this same Novus Ordo represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent. The "canons" of the rite definitively fixed at that time provided an insurmountable barrier to any heresy directed against the integrity of the Mystery (Alfredo Cardinal Ottaviani and Antonio Cardinal Bacci, Letter to Pope Paul 6, Thursday, September 25, 1969 A.D.).

IF you would like to know the source of this photograph, it is from the Pope's official newspaper, the L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO, Weekly Edition in English, Third Year, N. 17 (108) -  Thursday, APRIL 23, 1970 A.D., page # 2.

This photo of Friday, April 10, 1970 A.D. fully shows four of the six Protestants who are, from left to right:

1) Dr. George (shown shaking hands with Pope Paul 6);
2) Canon Jasper;
3) Dr. Shephard;
4) Dr. Konneth (the Pope's head is blocking most of Dr. Konneth although the top of his head is slightly visible);
5) Dr. Smith

It is certainly past time for sincere "Catholics" to start praying for the conversion to the CATHOLIC Faith, from the non-Catholic SatanicXVatican 2 church, of ALL of the members of the heretical, apostate and schismatic SatanicXVatican 2 church.

Please note: The terms "Protestant", "heretical" and "schismatic" are used within what has historically been the unchangeable position of the CATHOLIC Church regarding her official theological, dogmatic, liturgical, legal, etc., teachings, especially on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments.

Hence the terms "Protestant", "heretical" and "schismatic" are used within the context of objective definitions used historically and traditionally by the CATHOLIC Church in her lawful use of the various objective sciences of theology, liturgy, church history, canon law, philosophy, etc. as proven from the writings of well-respected authors of previous centuries whose legal precedents We simply follow.

Now, therefore, the members of the heretical, schismatic, and apostate  SatanicXVatican 2 church, for whom your prayers are requested for their conversion to the Catholic Church, include not only all of the Religious and Laity of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church, but also all of the Clergy of the    SatanicXVatican 2 church.

The reason is that, while professing themselves to be "Catholic", in terms of at least some of their theological and liturgical beliefs, especially regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, they are de facto PROTESTANTS, just as the 16th century "Catholic" Clergy, Religious and Laity were de factoPROTESTANTS in places like England and Germany!

Even today, many of them in these same places are still de facto PROTESTANTS! Among the  SatanicXVatican 2 church  PROTESTANT Clergy, who are hereby included, in virtue of the principle of lex orandi, lex credendi, as "Protestant", are the pope, plus the cardinals, bishops, priests and the lower ranks of the clergy of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church!

They are all under the censures of automatic excommunication for their direct, continuous violations of the Canons of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent, especially session 22 on the Mass, and the Quo Primum Tempore of Pope St. Pius V!

In other words, IF you say you are a "Catholic" (this applies most especially to Catholic Clergy) you are required thereby to teach, to believe and to practice the Faith of the Catholic Church, including the proper use of the ancient and approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC liturgical rites for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments.

What sense does it make for a "Catholic" Priest to use some kind of voodo rite for the Mass and the Sacraments. Catholics have a right to expect that their "Catholic" Priest will use the right Rite! That he will in fact use an ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical Rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments.

Consider, for a moment, how, because of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent and Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V, Catholics could peacefully expect that their "Catholic" pastors would in fact use that ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which both the Roman Catholic Council of Trent and the Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius V have guarded and protected with their anathemas!

Yet the  SatanicXVatican 2 church  has abandoned these integral Catholic defenses! This is why the Roman Theologians have included this subject within their STUDY and concluded with it.

VIII. The abandonment of defenses

Cardinal Ottaviani

"71. St. Pius V had the Roman Missal drawn up (as the present Apostolic Constitution itself recalls) so that it might be an instrument of unity among Catholics. In conformity with the injunctions of the Council of Trent it was to exclude all danger, in liturgical worship, of errors against the Faith, then threatened by the Protestant Reformation. The gravity of the situation fully justified, and even rendered prophetic, the saintly Pontiff's solemn warning given at the end of the Bull promulgating his Missal:  Should any person venture to do so, let him understand that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul."

"72. When the Novus Ordo was presented at the Vatican Press Office, it was asserted with great audacity that the reasons which prompted the Tridentine decrees are no longer valid. Not only do they still apply, but there also exist, as we do not hesitate to affirm, very much more serious ones [i.e., reasons] today. It was precisely in order to ward off the dangers which in every century threaten the purity of the deposit of faith ("depositum custodi, devitans profanas vocum novitates." that the Church has had to erect under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost the defenses of her dogmatic definitions and doctrinal pronouncements. These were immediately reflected in her worship, which became the most complete monument of her faith. To try to bring the Church's worship back at all cost to the ancient practice by refashioning, artificially and with that "unhealthy archeologism" so roundly condemned by Pius XII,what in earlier times had the grace of original spontaneity means--as we see today only too clearly--to dismantle all the theological ramparts erected for the protection of the Rite and to take away all the beauty by which it was enriched over the centuries."

"73. And all this at one of the most critical moments--if not the most critical moment--of the Church's history! Today, division and schism are officially acknowledged to exist not only outside of but within the Church. Her unity is not only threatened but already tragically compromised. Errors against the Faith are not merely insinuated but positively imposed by means of liturgical abuses and aberrations which have been equally acknowledged. To abandon a liturgical tradition which for four centuries was both the sign and the pledge of unity of worship(and to replace it with another which cannot but be a sign of division by virtue of the countless liberties implicitly authorized, and which teems with insinuations or manifest errors against the integrity of the Catholic religion) is, we feel in conscience bound to proclaim, an incalculable error."  (Roman Theologians, The Critical Study of the New Order of Mass, June 5, 1969, # 71-73).

Very few Catholics would-and NONE should-expect a "Catholic" Priest to use a voodo rite, or a hindu ritual, or a shaman ritual, or a Protestant supper meal in place of the CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass!

If the members of the shinto religion went to a service where their shinto priest used the Ancient Roman Rite of the CATHOLIC Church in place of their shinto rituals, would there not be a riot and such a shinto priest physically thrown out of their place of worship?

How many "catholic priests and bishops" of the  SatanicXVatican 2 church  have been physically thrown out of their churches for using the new Protestant supper-memorial-meal instead of the CATHOLIC traditional liturgical Rite for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass-the Ancient Roman Rite!?

The sad thing is that it seems that a vast majority of Catholics do NOT know their CATHOLIC Faith as well as they should!  This seems to be one of the reasons why the SatanicXVatican 2 church  has been so successful?!  It has taken advantage of the ignorance of its own people-victimizing them in this way while infecting them with the heresy of Modernism!

The innocent Catholic people who go to a SatanicXVatican 2 church  are getting something other than the ancient, approved VALID and LAWFUL CATHOLIC traditional liturgical rite [the Ancient Roman Rite] for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Seven Sacraments - despite denials to the contrary from the clergy of the SatanicXVatican 2 church!

Today, it seems as if there is really no substantial or ontologically essential difference between a person going to say the Protestant Anglican - Episcopalian Church, or a Lutheran Church or a Methodist Church, or some other Protestant Church and the SatanicXVatican 2 church  which seems to have become the official teacher, not of CATHOLICISM, but instead, of MODERNISM!

But in order to be a REAL, ACTUAL member of the Catholic Church, one must properly fulfill their duties of membership. On the contrary, IF a "Catholic" freely chooses NOT to fulfill ALL of his duties of membership in the CATHOLIC Church, that person is no longer a de facto "Catholic"!

IF a person who calls himself a "Catholic" practices some other faith, e.g., a PROTESTANT faith, then, in reality, that person can NOT any longer call himself a "Catholic" and all of the legalisms in the world of heretical Modernism can't change that truth!

“The intention of Pope Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic Liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy [which is only a memorial supper meal, not a sacrifice].  There was with Pope Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove, or, at least to correct, or, at least to relax, what was too Catholic in the traditional sense in the Mass and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist mass” (Jean Guitton [b. at Saint-Étienne, Loire, in East-Central France on Sunday, August 18, 1901 - d. at Paris, France on Sunday, March 21, 1999], Apropos, Number 17, December 19, 1993, (17), p. 8ff.  Also, Christian Order, October,1994. N.B.:  Jean Guitton was a confidant and an intimate friend of Pope Paul 6 who had 116 of his books and had made marginal study notes in 17 of these books.  Quotation and citations are in Christopher A. Ferrara and Thomas E. Woods, Jr., The Great Facade, The Remnant Publishing Company, 2002, p. 317).

“The intention of Paul VI with regard to what is commonly called the Mass, was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy — but what is curious is that Paul VI did that to get as close as possible to the Protestant Lord's supper.... there was with Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove, or at least to correct, or at least to relax, what was too Catholic, in the traditional sense, in the Mass – and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist Mass” (Jean Guitton, December 19 Radio Discourse, cited from Anthony Fraser, “Ecumenism – a Disaster for the Church”, Apropos, No. 18, 1996 (Scotland), p. 122).

He wrote:

“When I read the documents relative to the Modernism, as it was defined by Saint Pius X, and when I compare them to the documents of the Second Vatican Council, I cannot help being bewildered. For what was condemned as heresy in 1906 was proclaimed as what is and should be from now on the doctrine and method of the Church.

In other words, the modernists of 1906 were, somewhat, precursors to me. My masters were part of them. My parents taught me Modernism. How could Saint Pius X reject those that now seem to be my precursors?”  (Jean Guitton, Portrait du Père Lagrange, Paris: Éditions Robert Laffont, 1992, pp. 55-56)

In conclusion, We, though a sinner, pray that God will give each and every member of the   SatanicXVatican 2 church, through your prayers, the Grace of Conversion to the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation!

May all of us do this for the Greater Honor and Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls!

On Thursday, June 29, 1972, the Feast Day of Saints Peter and Paul, the ninth anniversary of his Papal Coronation as Pope, the last time a Roman Catholic Pope was crowned with the traditional Papal Tiara, the visible symbol of the Office of the Papacy, Pope Paul 6 said:

“From somewhere or other the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God ... In the Church, too, this state of uncertainty reigns. We thought that after the Council [Synod Vatican 2] a day of sunshine would have dawned for the history of the Church. What dawned, instead, was a day of clouds and storms, of darkness, of searching and uncertainties” (Pope Paul 6, Giovanni Battista Montini [Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978], Speech on Thursday, June 29, 1972; emphasis added).

“Indeed [Pope] Paul had alluded somberly to the smoke of Satan which has entered the Sanctuary... an oblique reference to an enthronement ceremony by  SATANISTS  in the Vatican” (Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. [b. in County Kerry, Ireland on Saturday, July 23, 1921 A.D. -  d. at New York, New York on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 A.D.], The Keys of This Blood, p. 632; emphasis added).

“The Devil in the Catholic Church is so protected now that he is like an animal protected by the government; put on a game preserve that outlaws anyone, especially hunters, from trying to capture or kill it. The Devil within the Church today is actually protected by certain Church authorities from the official Devil-hunter in the Church - the Exorcist...”(Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo [b. in Zambia on Friday June 13, 1930 A.D. - present], SPEECH: Satanists at work in the Vatican at the Fatima 2000 International Congress on World Peace held in Rome between Monday, November 18, 1996 A.D. through Saturday, November 23, 1996 A.D.; emphasis added).

Question: Are there men of the Curia who are followers of Satan?

Answer: “Certainly there are priests and bishops. I stop at this level of ecclesiastical hierarchy because I am an archbishop, higher than this I cannot go. Paul VI said that the smoke of Satan had entered into the Vatican” (Archbishop Emmanuel Milingo, Question and Answers following his Speech: Satanists at work in the Vatican at the Fatima 2000 International Congress on World Peace held in Rome between Monday, November 18, 1996 A.D. through Saturday, November 23, 1996 A.D.; emphasis added).

Father Malachi Martin, S.J.

“Archbishop Milingo is a good Bishop and HIS CONTENTION THAT THERE ARE SATANISTS IN ROME IS COMPLETELY CORRECT. Anybody who is acquainted with the state of affairs in the Vatican in the last 35 years is well aware that the prince of darkness [Satan] has had, and still has, his surrogates in the court of Saint Peter in Rome” (Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. [b. in County Kerry, Ireland on Saturday, July 23, 1921 A.D. -  d. at New York, New York on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 A.D.], emphasis added. Father Malachi Martin, S.J., before his death, was a Vatican insider and a best-selling author.)

“Besides, the incidence of SATANIC PEDOPHILIA - rites and practices  -  was already documented among certain bishops and priests as widely dispersed as Turin, in Italy, and South Carolina, in the United States. The cultic acts of SATANIC PEDOPHILIA are considered by professionals to be the culmination of the Fallen Archangel’s rites” (Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. [b. in County Kerry, Ireland on Saturday, July 23, 1921 A.D. -  d. at New York, New York on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 A.D.], a Vatican insider and best-selling author, The Keys of This Blood, p. 632; emphasis added).

Father Malachi Martin, S.J. vividly describes a ceremony called “The Enthronement of the Fallen Archangel Lucifer” held in Saint Paul's Chapel in the Vatican in his book, Windswept House.  Father Malachi Martin, S.J. also explains how this “enthronement” ceremony in the Vatican was happening at the very same time that these same Satanic Rites were being done here in the United States of America down in South Carolina!!

Some Readers might object to the use of a “novel”, i.e. Windswept House, which is classified as “fiction” rather than “non-fiction”, to prove the point?

On the contrary, according to an interview with The New American magazine, Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J. [b. in County Kerry, Ireland on Saturday, July 23, 1921 A.D. -  d. at New York, New York on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 A.D.], confirmed that this Satanic “Enthronement” ceremony actually DID happen, and that it happened exactly as he describes it in his book Windswept House.

The New American magazine also reported that Father Malachi verified that Windswept House is NOT a work of fiction. Rather, they report him telling them:

“Oh yes, it is true; very much so. But the only way I could put that down into print is in novelistic form.” (Father Malachi Brendan Martin, S.J.)

Unfortunately, this is the price one pays for writing the Truth - too often the only way it can be published is IF it is said to be fiction; a novel!

Also, according to The New American magazine, Father Malachi was also reported as saying that more members of the clergy were becoming aware of the situation, and that Archbishop Milingo, quoted above, was:

“merely like that actor in the movie Network, who got fed up and said, I’m not going to take it anymore.”

This also means that Windswept House tells the Truth that, YES, there was an actual Satanic Rite or Ceremony that took place in Saint Paul’s Chapel in the Vatican on Saturday, June 29, 1963!

This also means that Windswept House tells the Truth that, YES, there IS a general Satanic Conspiracy within what he calls the “Roman Church”, but which, for obvious reasons, is more accurately called: The  SatanicXVatican 2 church!!!

"To know Truth is a use or act of intellectual light, since, according to the Apostle (Ephesians 5:13): All that is made manifest is light. ...  Now every form bestowed on created things by God has power for a determined act, which it can bring about in proportion to its own proper endowment; and beyond which it is powerless, except by a superadded form, as water can only heat when heated by the fire. And thus the human understanding has a form, viz. intelligible light, which of itself is sufficient for knowing certain intelligible things, viz. those we can come to know through the senses. Higher intelligible things of the human intellect cannot know, unless it be perfected by a stronger light, viz. the Light of Faith or Prophecy which is called the Light of Grace, inasmuch as it is added to nature"  (Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., Summa Theologica, Part I-II, Question 109, Article 1).

In this Pastoral Letter, this  Light of Grace   is absolutely necessary to know and to understand the Truths found in it.  Sad to say, for whatever reason(s), not everyone is given this special Light of Grace   in order to read this Pastoral Letter intelligibly.

This explains why, in the final analysis, one must recourse to these two truisms:

“And they shall defile the Sanctuary of Strength, and shall take away the Continual Sacrifice  [The UNCHANGEABLE Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE Metaphysical Essence of the Unchangeable Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass Perfectly and Divinely Instituted by Jesus Christ which are found in The Valid and Lawful Catholic Traditional Approved Ancient Mass Rites.], and they shall place there the Abomination unto desolation  [The NOR - Novus Ordo Rite, a.k.a. NEW mass, Novus Ordo Missae]”(Daniel  11:31; emphasis added).
X

"He, that hath an ear, let him hear what the [Holy] Spirit saith to the churches:  To him, that overcometh, I will give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the Paradise of my God" (Apocalypse 2:7).

Cardinal “Wojtyla always takes along some reading matter wherever he goes, and during those long periods of voting in the conclave [at which JP-1 was elected] he was calmly perusing a [philosophy] book of political theory by Karl Marx. When a fellow Cardinal asked if he didn't feel it sacrilegious to read such an author in that sacred place, he answered with a good natured smile, My conscience is clear” (Wilton Wynn, KEEPERS OF THE KEYS, p. 39)!

“But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there shall be among you lying teachers, who shall bring in sects of perdition, and deny the Lord who bought them: bringing upon themselves swift destruction.  And many shall follow their riotousnesses, through whom the way of Truth shall be evil spoken of.  And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you. Whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their perdition slumbereth not.  For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but delivered them, drawn down by infernal ropes to the lower Hell, unto torments, to be reserved unto judgment...   The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly from temptation, but to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be tormented. And especially them who walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness” (2 Peter 2:1-4; 2:9-10).

“In an epistle sent at the time to Africa, he [Pope Saint Stephen I [Friday, May 12, 254 - Sunday, August 2, 257] laid down this rule: Let there be no innovation - nothing but what has been handed down”.  For that holy and prudent man well knew that true piety admits no other rule than that whatsoever things have been faithfully received from our Fathers the same are to be faithfully consigned to posterity. It is our duty to follow Religion, not to make Religion follow us.  The proper characteristic of Christians is not to impose their own beliefs or observances upon posterity, but to preserve and keep what we have received from those who went before us. What then was the issue of the whole matter? What but the usual and customary one? Antiquity was retained, novelty [i.e. change] was rejected”  (Father Saint Vincent of Lerins, A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter VI, ¶ 16; emphasis added).

---

Enlightened by God the Holy Ghost

1.  God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY ended the Old Covenant, which had only a shadow of the good things to come, not the very image of the things (Hebrews 10:1), with the Jewish Seder Supper on that First Holy Thursday evening.
 

2.  AFTER the PERFECT and DIVINE conclusion of the Old Covenant, God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted a VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant.
 

3.  This VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant was PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Offered by God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, to God the Father.  This was the First Mass.
 

4.  This VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant which God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted on that First Holy Thursday evening, historically is called the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church and the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church.
 

5.  What is apparently either not known, or otherwise virtually ignored, are the historical and liturgical facts that when God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant, which is called the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church and the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church, God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted the UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant which is called the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church and which is called the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church.
 

6.  Although there are some differences to be found in some of the various liturgical prayers and rubrics of all of the Liturgical Rites, ALL of these Liturgical Rites have the EXACT  SAME UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the EXACT  SAME  UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant which is called the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church and which is called the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church.
 

7.  Today one finds instances where Modernist Heretics, who are apologists for the NEW mass, the NOR, Novus Ordo Rite, Novus Ordo Missae, use the Sophist fallacy that because God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, did not use all of the exact same prayers and rubrics  which are found today when a validly Ordained Priest or a validly Consecrated Prelate

(a Bishop of whatever ecclesiastical rank of Jurisdiction - Auxiliary Bishop, Bishop, Archbishop, Primate, other Hierarch [the term used in the Eastern Rites], Patriarch)

that this somehow "proves" that the SatanicXVatican 2 church  popes,

(namely Pope Paul 6 [Giovanni Battista Montini. Friday, June 21, 1963 - Sunday, August 6, 1978] in his MISSALIS ROMANI [Sunday, April 6, 1969] in which the Pope promulgated his NOR, Novus Ordo Rite, Novus Ordo Missae, NEW mass, and Pope JP-2, a.k.a. John-Paul 2, Karol Wyotya [Monday, October 16, 1978 - Friday, April 1, 2005]  in his PAGAN Hindu Tilak “mass”.   Saturday, February 1, 1986 at a stadium in New Delhi, India (L’Osservatore Romano, Sunday, February 2, 1986), in his PAGAN Voodoo “mass” in July of 1980  (Rockford Register Star, Rockford, Illinois, Saturday, July 12, 1980), in his NUDE NOR (Novus Ordo Rite) “mass” in Papua, New Guinea, on Tuesday, May 8, 1984, in his PAGAN Aztec “mass” in the Satanic monstrosity called the basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City on Wednesday, July 31, 2002, and in all of his other anti-Catholic NOR's,)

NONSENSE!!!

9.  Schooled in the art of fallacies, the Sophist Modernist Heretic who does such things tries to confuse those with whom he is "debating".  What such a Sophist Modernist Heretic is actually doing is using what Scholastic Philosophy identifies as the Extradictional Material Fallacy which is called Ignoratio Elenchi (Irrelevant Conclusion).  This Extradictional Material Fallacy consists in evading the point at issue.  This Fallacy is also known by two other names: 1) Missing the Point; 2)  Ignoring the Issue.
 

10.  WHY do you suppose that the Sophist Modernist Heretic wants to use the Extradictional Material Fallacy of Ignoratio Elenchi (Irrelevant Conclusion) in order to evade the point at issue by deliberately Missing the Point and Ignoring the Issue?
 

11.  Because IF the Sophist Modernist Heretic was to honestly focus on the REAL issue, namely the PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the  PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant which is called the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church and which is called the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church, the said Sophist Modernist Heretic would be forced to accept the Truth of the matter - the point at issue - which is that ONLY those ANCIENT and APPROVED Liturgical Rites which are used for the "Divine Liturgy" in the Eastern Rites of the Roman Catholic Church, and the "Holy Sacrifice of the Mass" in the Western Rites of the Roman Catholic Church, are per se VALID and LAWFUL because they ALL contain, irregardless their language, their prayers, and their rubrics, the PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the  PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant!
 

12.  By the same token, because ALL of the NOR's, Novus Ordo Rites, NEW masses, Novus Ordo Missae, of Pope Paul 6 and Pope JP-2, CHANGED and DESTROYED the PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the  PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant, this means that ALL of the NOR's are per se INVALID and UNLAWFUL!  In plain Anglo-Saxon English this means ALL of the NOR's are NOT "masses" at all because they do not contain the PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Ontological Essence and the  PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted UNCHANGEABLE  Metaphysical Essence of this VERY SPECIFIC Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant, which God the Son, Jesus Christ, the Eternal High Priest, PERFECTLY and DIVINELY Instituted!
 

13.  Sophist Modernist Heretics can try to "prove" that this statement is not true by using every Fallacy of which they can think, but the bottom line is:

16. "The New Mass is a different liturgy. This needs to be said without ambiguity. The Roman Rite, as we knew it, no longer exists.  It has been DESTROYED!"
(Father Joseph Gelineau S.J. [b. at Champ-sur-Layon, Maine-et-Loire, West-Central France, on Sunday, October 31, 1920 - d. at Sallanches, a commune in the Haute-Savoie  department in the Rhône-Alps, South-Eastern France, on Friday, August 8, 2008].   He was a Synod Vatican 2 periti - expert - who helped to make up the NOR along with other anti-Catholics and the 6 Protestants.  He was, of course, a professional apologist for the NOR.  This quotation is from his book - Demain La Liturgk, Paris, 1976, pp. 9-10; emphasis added).

18.  Because the Perfectly and Divinely Instituted Unchangeable Ontological Essence and the  Perfectly and Divinely Instituted Unchangeable  Metaphysical Essence of this very specific Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant, is NOT found in "The New Mass"!

19.  WHY NOT?

20.  BECAUSE the essence of the Mass, "has been  destroyed!"

21.  In other words, the essence of the Mass, which consists in both the Perfectly and Divinely Instituted Unchangeable Ontological Essence and the  Perfectly and Divinely Instituted Unchangeable  Metaphysical Essence of this very specific Liturgical Rite for the New and Eternal Covenant, "has been  destroyed!"

23.  "Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the [Apostolic] Traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by Our Epistle"  (2 Thessalonians 2:14).

24.  "We charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the [Apostolic] Tradition which they have received of Us" (2 Thessalonians 3:6).

 

Reading

If thou wilt receive profit, read with humility, simplicity and faith; and seek not at any time the fame of being learned. (Thomas a'Kempis, Imitation of Christ, Book I, Chapter 5:2;4.)

Important Catholic Quotes for Today!

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

“Do notxheed
byxwhomxa thing is said,
butxrather whatxis said.”

(Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Letter to Brother John.)

Saint Paul the Apostle

“Am I then become your enemy,
because I tell you the Truth?”
(Saint Paul the Apostle
Epistle to the Galatians 4:16)

“Stand fast... hold the traditions.”
(Saint Paul the Apostle
2 Thessalonians 2:14)

Father Saint Vincent of Lerins

Magnopere curandum est
ut id teneamus quod ubique,
quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est.

“Care must especially be had that that [Faith] be held, which was believed everywhere, always, and by all.”

(Father Saint Vincent of Lerins [b. Toul, France, c. 400 A.D. - d. Island of Lerins, c. 450 A.D.], A Commonitory [an aid to memory] for the Antiquity and Universality of the Catholic Faith Against the Profane Novelties of All Heresies, Chapter 3; emphasis added.)

Roman Catholic Pope Saint Gregory I, the Great

“If people are scandalized at the Truth, it is better to allow the birth of scandal, than to abandon the Truth.”

 
(Roman Catholic Pope Saint Gregory I, the Great, [Friday, September 3, 590 - Monday, March 12, 604], Homily on Ezechiel, 7; cited by Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part II-II, Question 43, Article 7)

I am required to Teach the Truth and to warn everyone of the present evils, mindful of this warning to all Catholic Priests and Prelates:

---

Bishop Saint Ivo of Chartres

“Do not be one of those timourous physicians who like their tranquility more than the saving of the sick...”

“Even though Salome should dance before Herod, should ask for John's head and should obtain it from the detestable King, John's duty is to cry out: NON LICET! [It is not permitted!].”

(Bishop Saint Ivo of Chartres, a.k.a. Yves, I’ve, Yvo  [b. Beauvais, France or Auteuil, France, c. 1040 A.D. - d. Chartres, France, Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Bishop of Chartres [1090 A.D. - Tuesday, May 30, 1116 A.D.], Letter # 24, To Bishop Hugh of Lyons, October, 1094 A.D.)

Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X

“These latter days have witnessed a notable increase in the number of the enemies of the Cross of Christ, who, by arts entirely new and full of deceit, are striving to destroy the vital energy of the Church, and, as far as in them lies, utterly to subvert the very Kingdom of Christ.”

“Wherefore, We may no longer keep silence, lest We should seem to fail in Our most Sacred Duty, and lest the kindness that, in the hope of wiser counsels, We have hitherto shown them, should be set down to lack of diligence in the discharge of Our Office.”

(Roman Catholic Pope Saint Pius X, Giuseppe Sarto [Tuesday, August 4, 1903 - Thursday, August 20, 1914], Encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, On the Doctrine of the Modernists -  Sunday, September 8, 1907.)

Bishop Saint Isidore of Seville, Spain

“Therefore, heresy is so-called from the Greek word meaning choice, by which each chooses according to his own will what he pleases to teach or believe.”

“But we are not permitted to believe whatever we choose, nor to choose whatever someone else has believed.  We have the Apostles of God as authorities, who did not themselves of their own will choose what they would believe, but faithfully transmitted to the nations the teaching received from Christ.”

“So, even if ‘an Angel from Heaven’ should preach otherwise, he shall be called anathemaX(Saint Paul, Epistle to the Galatians 1:8.).”

(Bishop Saint Isidore of Seville, Spain, [b. Cartagena, Spain 560 A.D. - d. Seville, Spain, 636 A.D.], Doctor of the Catholic Church, Etymologies, 8, 3; emphasis added.)

Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.

“The Apostles and their successors are God’s vicars in governing the Church which is built on Faith and the Sacraments of Faith.”

“Wherefore, just as they may not institute another church, so neither may they deliver another faith, nor institute other sacraments...”

(Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P., [b. 1225 A.D. in Rocca Secca, Naples, Italy - d. Wednesday, March 7, 1274 A.D., in Fossa Nuova, Italy], Doctor of the Church, Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 64, Article 2, Reply to Objection 3; emphasis added).

Please click here to return to SSJ E-Newsletter. Please click here to return to Home Page. Thank You!

Copyright © 1990 A.D. - 2011 A.D. by Cordi-Marian Fathers. All Rights Reserved under international copyright conventions. Nothing on this page or on any of the other pages linked by this web page or on this entire web site may be used or reproduced in any manner or by any mechanical or electronic means, which includes not only transferal to other web pages, but also copying by any method(s), recording, storage in a database or other information retrieval system, or rewriting of any data, without the prior express and written permission of Cordi-Marian Fathers.